What's new

Republicans created Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
I'm heavily disappointed at Trump's top 3 candidates for VP: Chris Christie, Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich. Give me a break! This could very well be a make or break deal for me.
 
I'm heavily disappointed at Trump's top 3 candidates for VP: Chris Christie, Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich. Give me a break! This could very well be a make or break deal for me.
I think the importance of VP is generally overrated while the cabinet members are generally underrated. I've heard suggestions that Trump might announce some of his cabinet members before the election. That could be very interesting.
 
I think the importance of VP is generally overrated while the cabinet members are generally underrated. I've heard suggestions that Trump might announce some of his cabinet members before the election. That could be very interesting.

Not important at all, we'd be going from being friends with Russia who is currently leading the operation in the ME against ISIS, to basically the opposite (given that anything happened to Trump).
The three have a history of supporting a very interventionist foreign policy, exactly what the US doesn't need at this moment. I really don't know what Trump is thinking with this one.
 
Not important at all, we'd be going from being friends with Russia who is currently leading the operation in the ME against ISIS, to basically the opposite (given that anything happened to Trump).
The three have a history of supporting a very interventionist foreign policy, exactly what the US doesn't need at this moment. I really don't know what Trump is thinking with this one.

Yes because pre-WWII world was such a great world to live in. God damn the USA for creating world peace! We should give up the quest today an accept the monetary costs an death tolls of a viscious world yah? Throw away all are progress because anti war liberals have no stomach for violence. Guess what [MENTION=2931]Jamezz[/MENTION] we give up now we create MORE war not less.

You an [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] remind me of pre WWII America refusing to cure the world. Look how many extra casualties your attitudes cost us. Shame on you.
 
Yes because pre-WWII world was such a great world to live in. God damn the USA for creating world peace! We should give up the quest today an accept the monetary costs an death tolls of a viscious world yah? Throw away all are progress because anti war liberals have no stomach for violence. Guess what [MENTION=2931]Jamezz[/MENTION] we give up now we create MORE war not less.

You an [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] remind me of pre WWII America refusing to cure the world. Look how many extra casualties your attitudes cost us. Shame on you.

World peace. Hahahahahahaha
 
World peace. Hahahahahahaha

This is why you are Captain Oblivious. Wrapped up in your bubble. World strife has steadily declined ever since America decided to be world police. You can look up the facts. We ARE creating world peace. God Bless Miss America.

31a57bee349de499cab947ed6f2928b7.jpg
 
Have to admit Boris is a better read than 75% of you. Always up for a laugh.

Then he goes and adds pics!
 
Have to admit Boris is a better read than 75% of you. Always up for a laugh.

Then he goes and adds pics!
I do endorse teh pics even if I have to endure boris
 
Recent polling shows that even though Clinton has outspent Trump by a ginormous amount ($57 million to $4 million) (he hasn't even started running ads while she's spent a ton) he has closed the gap. It's now a dead heat, and he's ahead in several key swing states. A lot will happen before the election, but Dems who thought this was going to be easy will have another thing coming. Trump took all his competition by surprise so far, and somehow he seems to be doing the same thing to Hillary.

I was listening to MSNBC this morning. A Clinton insider claimed they were prepared to spend over $2 billion against Trump! The crazy thing is if she does that I could see him successfully turning it against her. Career politicians don't seem to be able to grasp how sick people are of what feels like a rigged system. Hillary getting off on the email scandal despite the mountain of evidence against her (especially the way Comey laid it out which is certain to play in many campaign ads) might have been the worst possible outcome for the Dems.
 
Okay, just some quick points.

1) The problem with Bengazi is not that anyone believes there was some sort of anti-American plot run by Clinton and Obama as Thriller suggested. It's that Clinton and Obama lied about the situation and tried to minimize it because of the impact they apparently believed the facts would have had on the election which was less than two months away.

2) The reason Hillary's email situation matters is not because she told a couple of white lies, but because it is reasonable to assume that she did it specifically to keep her communications out of the public record. Why do you think her husband suddenly started receiving speaking fees of up to $750 K, and then almost immediately afterward Hillary made policy decisions that massively benefited the groups he spoke to? The bottom line is that she put her personal interests ahead of the country's and she put American lives in danger as a result. Listen to what Comey said. Even if you are happy with his decision not to prosecute, I cannot imagine how anyone can deny that the evidence Comey laid out against her is devastating.

This is it? Are you kidding me? I ask how Hillary will ruin the country and you bring up a couple of things that she maybe lied about? Not specific policies, not parts of her platform, not how she's planning to do this or that and it'll affect the economy or foreign relations or anything like that? Hillary is as bad as Trump because she might have lied once or twice?

The things you listed are the biggest problem facing the country and therefore, Hillary is a horrible choice? Benghazi and some ****ing emails?! No wonder you don't get why black people, gay people, or just about everyone else in the country is so mad. When your biggest problem in life is Benghazi and an email server, life must be pretty damn good.
 
This is it? Are you kidding me? I ask how Hillary will ruin the country and you bring up a couple of things that she maybe lied about? Not specific policies, not parts of her platform, not how she's planning to do this or that and it'll affect the economy or foreign relations or anything like that? Hillary is as bad as Trump because she might have lied once or twice?

The things you listed are the biggest problem facing the country and therefore, Hillary is a horrible choice? Benghazi and some ****ing emails?! No wonder you don't get why black people, gay people, or just about everyone else in the country is so mad. When your biggest problem in life is Benghazi and an email server, life must be pretty damn good.
Many moderates are going to decide not to vote for her because the facts demonstrate that she is corrupt. I realize that the far left like you have no choice but to support her at this point. I'll bet you wish you could be backing a candidate with a lot less flaws, though.
 
Back
Top