Nope. Any sign and trade puts us over the apron and you can’t receive a player in a sign and trade unless you are under the apron.
Either you get Mike or you get nothing... next year I’d very much prefer Mike. In three years he might be toast and you’d prefer nothing. Based on DLs negotiating skills it’s a safe bet we give Mike 20% more than we should and an extra year more than we should.
Retaining Mike does mean you can move something else to fill in the roster imo... whether that is bogey or JC.
We done ran out of trade chips and are now putting our Rolex on the table.
Damn, so sign and trade is out as well. Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place. Sounds like re-signing him might be our only option to stay as competitive as possible. I just hope we can somehow add a competent backup point guard for when Mike inevitably misses 20-30 games a year and likely some playoff games.