What's new
By:

Rittenhouse

infection said:
What's your understanding of it? Because that appears to be the crux of the issue.
Click to expand...
Why don’t you tell me and we can go from there? I feel like I’ve expressed myself enough today. I thought it was pretty clear. I want to give you the opportunity to explain in your view why he was there.
 
The Thriller said:
Why don’t you tell me and we can go from there?
Click to expand...
You stated the connection of northern carpetbaggers "corrupting communities" and "taking their way of life" to Rittenhouse's defense. I'm asking where you got that connection. You aren't familiar with Rittenhouse's defense so I'm trying to ascertain where the connection came from, but you're asking me to answer the question of why he was there. I take that to mean that your presumption of Rittenhouse's defense being about defending against those "taking [his] way of life" is self-evident, despite being self-admittedly unfamiliar with the case at hand.
 
jazzVA said:
Yes start from the beginning. I’m sure it will be more productive this time around.
Click to expand...
True, this isn't going anywhere.

I invite others to look at this Rittenhouse incident not in the context of some individual “outlier” case. But as yet another case in what has become a pattern of a backlash movement against the social, political, and demographic change.

You don’t get Trump without Obama.
 
The Thriller said:
True, this isn't going anywhere.

I invite others to look at this Rittenhouse incident not in the context of some individual “outlier” case. But as yet another case in what has become a pattern of a backlash movement against the social, political, and demographic change.

You don’t get Trump without Obama.
Click to expand...
You are correct it’s a backlash against you. The issue is how you perceive the reasoning for the backlash. Most people are just tired of people like yourself twisting things into nonsense that isn’t true of most people. Most people can look at this case, especially those who watched it, and see how insanely ridiculous the takes by leftists are. It’s insane to prop him up as any sort of hero or example as well. The backlash is because leftists twist and squirm and turn everything into exactly the delusional fallacies you’re presenting above and painting them as true and any disagreement from your fallacies will be met with “you’re a Republican white supremacist and racist!!!) Including myself who has voted for Bernie in 2 primaries, and Biden in the general election. You can’t fathom the fact leftists ideas are plainly just….stupid to a lot of people including those who are on your side as far as many policies go but are tired of your fallacies, rhetoric, ridiculous and baseless accusations, etc. Again, it’s why in polls where Democrats policies are broken down separately the public generally supports. It’s the party and extremists within the party and their rhetoric most of us can’t stand. It’s also the “I’m a better person than you because I call everything white supremacy” garbage that has grown old.
 
One Brow said:
On both sides.

Wait, does that mean I'm playing the "both sides do it" card?
Click to expand...
Certainly better for him than to explicitly denounce BL. However, it should be noted that historically people say one thing but do the other. How many “pro civil rights” people fought against bussing? Part of the problem is that one doesn’t need to be explicitly racist anymore. They just need to be “protective of their communities” to commit acts of white vigilantism.

Hopefully Rittenhouse backs his support of BLM with actions.

The main issue for me is the white vigilantism which I believe fits a pattern of backlash that we’ve seen increasingly over the last few years against demographic, political, and societal change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dkeaton024 said:
You are correct it’s a backlash against you. The issue is how you perceive the reasoning for the backlash. Most people are just tired of people like yourself twisting things into nonsense that isn’t true of most people. Most people can look at this case, especially those who watched it, and see how insanely ridiculous the takes by leftists are. It’s insane to prop him up as any sort of hero or example as well. The backlash is because leftists twist and squirm and turn everything into exactly the delusional fallacies you’re presenting above and painting them as true and any disagreement from your fallacies will be met with “you’re a Republican white supremacist and racist!!!) Including myself who has voted for Bernie in 2 primaries, and Biden in the general election. You can’t fathom the fact leftists ideas are plainly just….stupid to a lot of people including those who are on your side as far as many policies go but are tired of your fallacies, rhetoric, ridiculous and baseless accusations, etc. Again, it’s why in polls where Democrats policies are broken down separately the public generally supports. It’s the party and extremists within the party and their rhetoric most of us can’t stand. It’s also the “I’m a better person than you because I call everything white supremacy” garbage that has grown old.
Click to expand...
I think we have found Jazzy’s alt.
 
The Thriller said:
I think we have found Jazzy’s alt.
Click to expand...
Or maybe there’s just a lot of people out there who can see how twisted and deranged leftists are. There’s a distinction between the liberals and leftists, and the twisted fallacies of leftists aren’t popular, nor should they be. They’re the loudest voice in the room, there also the voice everyone’s rolling their eyes at just wishing you’d get some help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top