Roster Addition Wish List
- Thread starter LoPo
- Start date
candrew
Well-Known Member
I like Dinwiddie seems like a guy that will fit the culture too.
Jazz would have MAJOR length at the PG with him and Dante splitting minutes.
Right now tho he's shooting WAY over his career averages - the jump is even atypical for a contract year.
Interesting to see if he can sustain them.
Not a guy who makes a lot of plays passing the ball - but doesn't make a lot of mistakes either.
Jazz would have MAJOR length at the PG with him and Dante splitting minutes.
Right now tho he's shooting WAY over his career averages - the jump is even atypical for a contract year.
Interesting to see if he can sustain them.
Not a guy who makes a lot of plays passing the ball - but doesn't make a lot of mistakes either.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
He is going to make 32 million, and yes.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Is he worth $32 to us? Would we start Mitchell at PG, Middleton at SG, Ingles at SF?
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
kemba
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Terry Rozier?
Attitude, shooting, can be acquired.
Attitude, shooting, can be acquired.
And if he plays like he has for the 80% of the rest of his career?
Last edited:
Miggs
Well-Known Member
We’re SOL.
I will say these things just to say them:
1 - Locke mentioned at some point in the offseason that he didn't think the idea of keeping a team together just because they were close was a good idea because every season is simply different. What may be true one year with something so delicate as on and off court chemistry is basically certain to change just because change is the constant in existence.
2 - Most teams get better over an offseason, so the question of improving a record is a question of how much better you got than other teams got better. Considering that, standing pat makes you worse. Keeping the roster virtually identical was a mistake and I felt that way heading into the offseason, during it, and coming out of it. I am not saying the team needs to be blown up, but when you take the fairy dust of last season's surge away, this roster seriously lacks stars and spacing, and this team's two franchise players either thrive (Mitchell) or simply require (Gobert) space to be their best.
Pursuing star free agents was already a bit of a fringe notion, but if things keep going the way they are, the idea should basically be abandoned altogether.
1 - Locke mentioned at some point in the offseason that he didn't think the idea of keeping a team together just because they were close was a good idea because every season is simply different. What may be true one year with something so delicate as on and off court chemistry is basically certain to change just because change is the constant in existence.
2 - Most teams get better over an offseason, so the question of improving a record is a question of how much better you got than other teams got better. Considering that, standing pat makes you worse. Keeping the roster virtually identical was a mistake and I felt that way heading into the offseason, during it, and coming out of it. I am not saying the team needs to be blown up, but when you take the fairy dust of last season's surge away, this roster seriously lacks stars and spacing, and this team's two franchise players either thrive (Mitchell) or simply require (Gobert) space to be their best.
Pursuing star free agents was already a bit of a fringe notion, but if things keep going the way they are, the idea should basically be abandoned altogether.
Right.
Another 4-6 weeks could be the season at this rate. I don't have a particular answer, I'm just so sick of everyone trying to cobble pieces together that don't naturally fit.