I see where you are coming from, but obviously we completely disagree with the direction and both can twist the narrative our own way. So this is kinda pointless to debate about.
Still disagree about the Conely part, since we had multiple callers from teams who were on the buyer side of things. They saw Conley as a cheap upgrade, and I'm 100% sure we had SRP deals on the table but Danny rightfully doesnt give a fk about some Clippers future second rounders. He was never a dump.
As for their actions supporting what they say... they traded away 2 pieces that didnt fit (Beasley and Vando) and 3rd (Conley) who wasnt going to be in our championship window. The most telling thing however was that they didnt trade away Clarkson and KO. Justify keeping those two based on your tanking logic. If I wanted to tank, I sell them both for the highest bidder for sure. I mean we were what 2 games above Indy at the deadline?
I disagree with the idea but I do think they want JC here long term. Im a fan of his but going forward would rather go in a different direction. KO has lost any of his earlier season trade value and is more valuable to us with his 3m guaranteed option for next season. Again comes down to flexibility. JC could leave for a better offer and KO could be cut and we have an additional 25m in cap space this off season.
I don't think keeping either player stop us from having the third worst record in the west. My biggest gripe in regards to keeping them is the opportunity its stop others from getting, rather than adding more wins.