What's new
By:

Rudy Gobert has got to go

cmw said:
Umm. Ooops

Sent from my SM-J727T using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Nah, I still think Gobert is certainly not untouchable. The Jazz have played much better since his return though. How dare I make assessments based off of reality during the time when the Jazz were playing terrible and had one if the worst lineups in the NBA. Even with Gobert playing this well, the Jazz are not a playoff team at this point. Would I trade him still? Only if the right pieces were offered - doesn't mean I'd want to. It's pretty simple, really

People get too caught up on being sooth sayers and predicting the future with fandom. Although that can be an important aspect to the NBA, so is living in the now.

Watching the Jazz make their improvements over this year is really testament to Synder's coaching.
 
Jack Strop said:
Though the premise of the OP is ridiculous, the Jazz still have the same problems that many pointed out: Rubio, Favors and Gobert shouldn't be playing together. Jazz are back to struggling against teams they should be beating by 30 pts because Bricky is no longer shooting lights out. Favors and Gobert are both 5's. Either can be effective inside, but both together is not a good combination.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing. The Jazz aren't the Warriors. Yes, We've had some amazing wins this year by huge margins. But that isn't the norm, and shouldn't be, for a team constituted like ours. Sometimes the worst teams in the league get blown out by 30, sometimes they hang close even against decent and good teams. Yes, the lineup could use some tweaks. But the idea that 30 point blowouts should be the standard needs to go away.
 
Lol @ people thinking I'm wrong for saying Gobert isn't a top 10 player in the NBA and he's not untouchable.

Dat homerism, doe.

Again, quote me where I said something wrong and I'll own it.
 
Archie Moses said:
What was I wrong about? Saying Gobert isn't untouchable?

Yeah, um, ok, dude.
Click to expand...

It's all there. An honest person would just own it, you know? I don't think your takes on this deserve any more time. If you want to go back and correct them yourself I would respect the hell out of that move.
 
Quin's Murderface said:
It's all there. An honest person would just own it, you know? I don't think your takes on this deserve any more time. If you want to go back and correct them yourself I would respect the hell out of that move.
Click to expand...
Quote something you have issues or disagree with instead of writing some generic response that shows you don't even know what you have issues with.

Thanks,

Hehepeepeecaca
 
Archie Moses said:
Quote something you have issue or disagree with instead of writing some generic response that shows you don't even know what you have issues with.

Thanks,

Hehepeepeecaca
Click to expand...

Nah like I said it's not worth the time. I read through the whole thing which is why I called you out by name. You were all over the place. If you don't understand why at this point you likely never will or are just going to stubbornly argue. It's not worth any more of my time. Cheers.
 
Quin's Murderface said:
Nah like I said it's not worth the time. I read through the whole thing which is why I called you out by name. You were all over the place. If you don't understand why at this point you likely never will or are just going to stubbornly argue. It's not worth any more of my time. Cheers.
Click to expand...
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If it's all over the place, then it should be easy to find. I dare you to quote one thing you have issues with where I was totally wrong.

If you can't, sthu and stay in your lane.

Hehepeepeecaca
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top