fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
2020-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Good post. Rudy is better than mutombo on offense and defense imo (talking primes)Okay, well, I mean... Shawn Bradley averaged double-doubles in the 90s (who has a 20.4 BMI compared to Rudy's 25.1). But, since the numbers game couldn't support Mutombo>Rudy argument, I guess we can pivot that argument to the less-testable theoretical realm.
Let's see if we can contextualize any numbers in a way that would illuminate the theoretical.
Mutombo's career points per 36 minutes is 11.5.
Rudy's career points per 36 minutes is 15.
30% more.
The 90s? Okay,
The average points scored per game over the course of Mutombo's career is 98.1.
The average points scored per game over the course of Gobert's career is 107.6.
Scoring is up 9.7%.
Should we correct for pace?
Per 100 possessions, Mutombo scored 16.7 points.
Per 100 possessions, Rudy scored 20.9 points.
Rudy scores 25% more per possession.
Offensive rating per 100 possessions?
Rudy 127
Dikembe 111
eFG%?
Rudy 65.4%
Dikembe 51.8%
This reminds me of a discussion Michael Scott had with an Indian guy when he worked at a call center. The Indian guy had a lot of work ethic and was showing up Michael, which led to the following discussion:
Vikram: I was a surgeon back home.
Michael Scott: Really?
Vikram: Yeah.
Michael Scott: Wonder what I would've been back home.
Vikram: Well, this is your home.
Michael Scott: I know, but I mean, it's so competitive here. What's the dollar worth in your land? Medical school must've cost, like, 40 bucks or a donkey or something.
Vikram: Uh, no.
Michael Scott: I would've been chief of surgery.
I bet Mutombo would be averaging 20 ppg in this era. Dat jump hook doe.
And Michael Scott is the GOAT