What's new

Rumor: Warriors have interest in trading for Ingles if made available by the jazz.

No argument for me. The main concern is that DD can fill in every time Kawhi out so the offense doesn't drop off as much.
May or may not be correct.
I think the Clippers already burned their TPMLE on Batum though. And for the Lakers, I’d MUCH rather have Danny Green than Derozan.
 
Moody can't be traded for 30 days after signing his contract, correct?
 
In light of the Gay signing:

If the Warriors made that offer on Bogey, I’d pull the trigger without blinking. Bogey would be a deadly get for them as well.
 
Just to put it out there: Looney is a far better player than Paschall right now (though perhaps a lower ceiling), and is only a few months older. He and Paschall are DM's age. And he managed to play 61 games last year.
 
Honestly at this point, I'd argue (taking in to account my undying love for Joe) this actually makes Bojan way more valuable.
The perimeter still needs to be addressed, he's still one-dimensional, and probably has higher trade value.
Regardless of sentiment, Bojan makes more sense as trade bait.
I agree. I would rather trade Bojan.

Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Lol guys what in the **** is wrong with some of you. Ingles is an expiring contract and probably retires at the end of the year.

Moody is the exact type of player we need.
This is the only reason I give pause to saying yes to a deal like this. Even if he does resign in a year, when does he drop off. He’s getting into that age range in a year or two. How long is too long to hold onto him, especially since he has value now.

One thing that worries me is he had his best year last year, does he begin a slow decline? The problem is that it feels like we taking our name off of the contention list doing this.
 
Ingles can’t play starters minutes but Bogey can. **** giving GS Bogey.

Reports are we would rather deal Ingles anyways.
 
Back
Top