campaignist
Well-Known Member
No argument for me. The main concern is that DD can fill in every time Kawhi out so the offense doesn't drop off as much.Sure. But I kinda think DeRozan is not a winning basketball player.
May or may not be correct.
No argument for me. The main concern is that DD can fill in every time Kawhi out so the offense doesn't drop off as much.Sure. But I kinda think DeRozan is not a winning basketball player.
Good god, that was a little over the top dude.He's got a ****ing 7'1 wingspan and a 8'9 standing reach while being 211 lbs at a 19 year old (born in May, so a pretty young 19 year old at that).
He's not a tweener jesus christ. Look up some basic information before you spout garbage.
I think the Clippers already burned their TPMLE on Batum though. And for the Lakers, I’d MUCH rather have Danny Green than Derozan.No argument for me. The main concern is that DD can fill in every time Kawhi out so the offense doesn't drop off as much.
May or may not be correct.
Yep.Moody can't be traded for 30 days after signing his contract, correct?
Also, DeRozan is only 31, which doesn't fit the profile at all.And for the Lakers, I’d MUCH rather have Danny Green than Derozan.
I agree. I would rather trade Bojan.Honestly at this point, I'd argue (taking in to account my undying love for Joe) this actually makes Bojan way more valuable.
The perimeter still needs to be addressed, he's still one-dimensional, and probably has higher trade value.
Regardless of sentiment, Bojan makes more sense as trade bait.
This is the only reason I give pause to saying yes to a deal like this. Even if he does resign in a year, when does he drop off. He’s getting into that age range in a year or two. How long is too long to hold onto him, especially since he has value now.Lol guys what in the **** is wrong with some of you. Ingles is an expiring contract and probably retires at the end of the year.
Moody is the exact type of player we need.