Science vs. Creationism

[PearlWatson]

The Darwiniac creation myth relies on relational resemblance, but there is even a problem with that.

This looks like that but Janet never gave birth to Elton

 

[Bawse Dawg]

Evolution backed up by scientific evidence and observation is a myth.

But a book written thousands of years ago is a fact.

Don't argue for the bible by trying to use science in your argument.


Dat app doe.

 

[PearlWatson]

Both birds and crocodilians are surviving archosaurs.

Crocodilians, pterosaurs and dinosaurs survived the Triassic–Jurassic extinction event about 195 million years ago, but other archosaurs became extinct.

Non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs perished in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, but crocodilians and birds (the only remaining dinosaur group) survived. Both are descendants of archosaurs, and are therefore archosaurs themselves under phylogenetic taxonomy.

Learning begins when you do not know the answer.

It is certainly an adventure to learn your creation myth.

What did this archosaur look like? Did it gain attributes or lose them to become a bird?

 

[MVP]

It is all pterosaurs fault, had they survived and crocodilians gone extinct we would not have this discussion. Dang pterosaurs.

 

[PearlWatson]

But a book written thousands of years ago is a fact.

Says the "The Preservation of favored races in the struggle for life" thumper.

 

[PearlWatson]

It is all pterosaurs fault, had they survived and crocodilians gone extinct we would not have this discussion. Dang pterosaurs.

Yes, it is the pterosaurs fault for making your creation myth look retarded.

What did this archosaur look like? Did it gain attributes or lose them to become a bird?

 

[MVP]

Yes, it is the pterosaurs fault for making our creation myth look retarded.

I fixed it for you. We do not have creation myth. We have evidence of evolution.

 

[PearlWatson]

We have evidence of evolution.

What does this archosaur look like? Did it gain attributes or lose them to become a bird?

 

[MVP]

For starters you can read this:

https://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/taxa/verts/archosaurs/archosauria.php

 

[One Brow]

Says the "The Preservation of favored races in the struggle for life" thumper.

No one here claims that book's proposals is undisputed fact; the evidence supports much of the book, but counters some parts of it.

 

[Bawse Dawg]

What does this archosaur look like? Did it gain attributes or lose them to become a bird?

That sig pic is hilarious.

Hell of a roll model.

 

[PearlWatson]

For starters you can read this:

https://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/taxa/verts/archosaurs/archosauria.php

"The ancestral archosaurs probably originated some 250 million years or so ago..."

Awesome "evidence!"

It is just another one of those times the "common ancestor" didn't fossilize, so you can't tell me jack about it.