Is DNA more or less ordered than the general disorder of the universe?
About the same. DNA has so much material that codes for nothing, material that codes for two different things, duplicate material, etc. It's mostly noise.
Is DNA more or less ordered than the general disorder of the universe?
Just pointing out that without outside influence a natural system tends toward disorder, not toward order, yet DNA and evolution certainly seem more ordered than generally expected. So what is the outside influence?
Just pointing out that without outside influence a natural system tends toward disorder, not toward order, yet DNA and evolution certainly seem more ordered than generally expected. So what is the outside influence?
Just pointing out that without outside influence a natural system tends toward disorder, not toward order, yet DNA and evolution certainly seem more ordered than generally expected. So what is the outside influence?[/QUOTE]
Natural selection!!!!!!
By definition that would be part of the system, not an outside influence.
The question is: is the Earth’s surface, oceans and atmosphere an isolated system? Given that we receive energy both externally from the Sun, internally from the Earth’s core, and also a little bit cosmically from sources beyond our Solar System, the answer is no. In addition, we also radiate energy away, back out into the Universe. By all accounts, the Earth is not an isolated system. If it were — if we prevented it from absorbing or emitting any radiation or information with the outside Universe — only then could we apply the second law of thermodynamics to it.
Been trying to convince my wife to do this for awhile now.... Maybe I'll just take my kids this spring break why she is working!!!
Evolution doesn't kill you Deity it shows his hand!!!
By DNA, are you referring to DNA as its biochemical structure? Or rather, the science of genomics?
Because if we pooled every super-computer and ran it until the end of time, we still would not be able to completely and precisely sequence the entire genome of a single human-being, due to the hyper-randomness, unexpected-repetitivity, and ambiguity of genomics & epigenomics.
Most human genetic sequencing has been exon-centered (which constitute around ~1-2% of our DNA) while the rest of DNA is scrapped as "junk DNA", due to a combination of us either not devising ways to get them to be transcribed in the lab, or the fact that DNA does not need to be transcribed into an mRNA or protein molecule in order to be biochemically active. We can only sequence DNA (via shotgun-sequencing) via 500 base-pair reads at a time, despite the fact that some DNA strands can be tandem-repeats over tens-of-thousands of base pairs. I'm sure you could comprehend the mathematical nightmare that this would entail, as the computers would need to handle n^x calculations just to entertain every possibility of every read used to sequence the single genome.
Consequently, we tend to identify only 2% of the DNA, and only the ones that are short, and non-repetitive enough (while undertaking massive mathematical assumptions) due to the complexity of an organism's genome.
The paper mentioned in this article appraised 80% of human DNA as biochemically active, and it was published in Nature: https://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/09/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html.
So to answer your question: perhaps it is ordered quite definitely, however we are no-where near understand Genomics completely, much like we are no where near using mathematics to properly-modelling the disorder of the universe.
This is exactly how I feel, and is one of the main reasons I find it easy to have faith in my religion. Did an all-powerful God just snap his fingers and POW, Human Beings? Or would he use science? When I go outside to create my amazing garden in the spring I don't just snap my fingers and POW, delicious fruits and vegetables! I have to plant the seeds and nurture it over time. Science > Magic
Wouldn't mind seeing this amazing garden.
Jazzfanz agrees.
Seriously? You took the words right out of my mouth.
Lolol. That got way too wordy-- but it's actually pretty simple if I had the time to properly explain.
By definition that would be part of the system, not an outside influence.
So how big is the system that we can call "isolated", nothing less than the universe itself? Is our galaxy or local cluster an isolated system?
But it does get into another interesting part of the discussion. If the entire universe is the only naturally occurring isolated system we can identify, then what outside influence has caused the change in entropy?