green
Well-Known Member
The point to remember is not every team will be an OKC and have a Kevin Durant led squad that can suck ***, stockpile lottery picks and then suddenly figure out how to win the following season. The Jazz aren't the first team in the history of the NBA to trade a superstar and attempt to rebuild around young talent. There have been numerous crash and burn scenarios with teams that at the time had more assets and a better looking young nucleus than the Jazz have now. Just because something looks good on paper - there have been far too many failures using this method to take any season for granted.
Also, the Jazz are a great organization. They aren't the Clippers or Timberwolves or even the Bulls. They are run better. In fact, the only better run organizational may be the Spurs.
Second, Utah is in a great situation ala OKC. We have two very good young players in Favors and Hayward. We have two very promising players in Kanter and Burks. If we get a top three pick AND GS's pick, that will give us three top three picks, and two more lottery picks. Memo is coming off the books. Jefferson and Bell and CJ are next. Utah has talent, they have cap room, we are in a time that the Jazz can become legit title contenders in a screwed up system or they can be middle of the pack for the next ten years (when the next lockout happens).
Me, I'll take one crappy year, when we have no shot to win anything anyways, then 10 crappy years, knowing we can never get the talent the big market teams can because we just had to be scrappy and come in 9th place one year. That will Jefferson's legacy before he leaves, and that will be the reason why we will be trading Favors for picks in six years. No thanks.