What's new
By:

Sharia Law vs. Muslim Tolerance

PearlWatson said:
What you can't see is that defending rotten apples because they happen to be apples is the route of generalization.
Click to expand...

And why would I not be able to see it? I told you to care less for the people that categorizes you no matter which side of the political scale they appear. I'm not a fanatic of anything. I'm not an idealist, except for trying to do the best you can to be just and a good person and I try picking the best out of every idealism and thought to form a personal ideals system that makes sense to me. I don't defend apples because they are apples. Whoever does is open to being accused of generalization. I understand that you have your own government that has everything covered to not like Muslims so much anymore after the attack. But know that some people value others above being apples and oranges, they are not blinded by a certain idealism and protect their brethren, they just try to be a good person. I try to be one. And this leads you to do things and believe in people who you thought you never would.
 
PearlWatson said:
It is kinda hard to do so when you get called a fascist, islamophobe, racist, misogynist, xenophobe or whatever demagogic term liberals come up with to shut down debate.
Click to expand...

Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.
 
dalamon said:
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

My favorite part about this post is the fact that PearlSlopper will not respond.
 
dalamon said:
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.
Click to expand...

When the only instrument you understand is a hammer, you see every other instrument out there as a hammer, as well.
 
dalamon said:
Oh God, this is so rich. You generalize posters with debate-destroying terms more than anyone on these forums.


Everyone check out the Creationism thread, and see how many scientific posts that PearlWatson refutes by using the word "Darwinist"-- even in light of numerous posters specifying that they are not atheists.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

You don't have to be an atheist to be a Darwinist, as you have shown.
 
addictionary said:
And why would I not be able to see it? I told you to care less for the people that categorizes you no matter which side of the political scale they appear. I'm not a fanatic of anything. I'm not an idealist, except for trying to do the best you can to be just and a good person and I try picking the best out of every idealism and thought to form a personal ideals system that makes sense to me. I don't defend apples because they are apples. Whoever does is open to being accused of generalization. I understand that you have your own government that has everything covered to not like Muslims so much anymore after the attack. But know that some people value others above being apples and oranges, they are not blinded by a certain idealism and protect their brethren, they just try to be a good person. I try to be one. And this leads you to do things and believe in people who you thought you never would.
Click to expand...

I ain't talking personally. As a female conservative in a liberal male mob, on this forum, I'm used to idiotic attacks. I'm talking generally, in the media, during political discourse.

I can appreciate your personal philosophy, but can you explain to me your knowledge of Benito Mussolini and how he came to power.
 
PearlWatson said:
I ain't talking personally. As a female conservative in a liberal male mob, on this forum, I'm used to idiotic attacks. I'm talking generally, in the media, during political discourse.

I can appreciate your personal philosophy, but can you explain to me your knowledge of Benito Mussolini and how he came to power.
Click to expand...


I already did. People are like flies attacking to the bright light when it comes to power. (No offense humanity!)
 
PearlWatson said:
The fascism part was absurd.




It is kinda hard to do so when you get called a fascist, islamophobe, racist, misogynist, xenophobe or whatever demagogic term liberals come up with to shut down debate.
Click to expand...


BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.
 
addictionary said:
BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.
Click to expand...

PearlWatson is about the only person on this forum that would do, and has done, those things.
 
addictionary said:
BTW this totally is a generalizable conceptual situation. I hate it too. In here, if you say anything good about being a Turk, you celebrate a national thing, you get called a fascist, a racist by certain people led by radical Islamists and separatists.
Click to expand...

I thought you were the one defining fascism as national pride, that is why I was asking you to elaborate on Mussolini. I don't think having pride in your country is necessarily a bad thing.

I didn't know you were a Turk, and have no preconceived notions about what it means to be one. I know idividuals from Jordan, Lebanon, and Armenia, but not Turkey.
 
PearlWatson said:
I thought you were the one defining fascism as national pride, that is why I was asking you to elaborate on Mussolini. I don't think having pride in your country is necessarily a bad thing.

I didn't know you were a Turk, and have no preconceived notions about what it means to be one. I know idividuals from Jordan, Lebanon, and Armenia, but not Turkey.
Click to expand...

Well, being a one pretty much means to be that person i your quote. Goddamn traitors trying to destroy everything we've earned by our ancestors blood. By ancestors I mean both women and men. And kids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top