I want Mitchell to be our PG. I wanted that before pursuing and getting Conley. Then we got him. We spent all offseason preparing rotations around Conley and Mitchell.Which is it? Are we better off having Mitchell as our starting PG or better off with a starting PG next to Mitchell?
The whole premise that we don’t need Conley started when Mitchell was our PG and balled out. You can’t have it both ways.
Yeah cuz we could have use his 30 mil to pay for actual pieces to help our chances instead of watching from the bench?It’s just comical that everyone is so quick to blame Conley for our issues and now he isn’t playing and we’re still struggling.
While down 17 halfway through the 4th?This one reeks of loss already..