What's new
By:

Should the Jazz "Unleash" Collin Sexton?

KqWIN said:
The cost is the risk and vice versa lmao. If we traded Clarkson for Lonzo, for example, it would not be a high risk high reward because we're not losing the 10th in the draft.
Click to expand...
Not the way I see it. If you think the 10th pick is a great pick then I guess you could use that mental gymnastics.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Not the way I see it. If you think the 10th pick is a great pick then I guess you could use that mental gymnastics.
Click to expand...

Sure, I'm the one using mental gymnastics. If it makes you feel better to say that, go ahead. You also said it was intellectually dishonest to call a below average a below average shooter....so I'm not to concerned about the way you see it.

When compared to nothing (or shedding negative contracts) in the Lonzo/Simmons examples, the 10th pick definitely does not qualify as "extreme low cost" in my book.
 
KqWIN said:
Sure, I'm the one using mental gymnastics. If it makes you feel better to say that, go ahead. You also said it was intellectually dishonest to call a below average a below average shooter....so I'm not to concerned about the way you see it.

When compared to nothing (or shedding negative contracts) in the Lonzo/Simmons examples, the 10th pick definitely does not qualify as "extreme low cost" in my book.
Click to expand...
71Z6gvIqVsL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg


This must be your book.
 
I’ve been in Sexton’s corner ever since he put the Jazz jersey on. But I never thought he could be a starter on our next contending team. Would any of the top contenders play Sexton as a starter? Boston? Denver? Thunder? Mavericks? Timberwolves? They wouldn’t. He is limited as a point guard, not a PG type (playmaker who can run the offense), and he lacks size and defensive skills as a shooting guard. If I’m Danny, I’d trade him for draft assets or in a deal for a star.
 
Last edited:
fishonjazz said:
The discussion was "why was sexton being held back" and "will sexton continue to be held back going forward"
Click to expand...
When I think about it, this is exactly how he needs to be coached. No one held Sexton back but Sexton. There are different coaching methods you can use. Trick is you can’t coach everyone the same. Player A won’t respond to the same time of coaching Sexton does. A great coach finds a way to get the best out of his players and they ain’t going to accomplish that by treating every player the same.
 
gomretat said:
Again, agree to disagree. His individual stats might look good but the whole offense shuts down when Sexton is dominating the ball. I hope Hardy keeps the leash on.
Click to expand...
You said HE better produce at a high level. He does. End of story. You can disagree with facts if you want to I guess.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
underdog said:
I’ve been in Sexton’s corner ever since he put the Jazz jersey on. But I never thought he could be a starter on our next contending team. Would any of the top contenders play Sexton as a starter? Boston? Denver? Thunder? Mavericks? Timberwolves? They wouldn’t. He is limited as a point guard, not a PG type (playmaker who can run the offense), and he lacks size and defensive skills as a shooting guard. If I’m Danny, I’d trade him for draft assets or in a deal for a star.
Click to expand...
I think all of those teams would play him if you swapped out the guy they are already playing at starting point guard and gave them Sexton. And I think Sexton would do well.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top