I dont think Keyonte/Sexton is a good duo and I would want to upgrade Keyonte's starting position and have Keyonte develop as a 6th man (not to ultimately be a 6th man, just not the pressure of starting) and have him as an insurance policy next to Sexton. But at the same time I wouldnt balk at having them both start this year just to see. Maybe the improvement from Hendricks/Collins/Walker/Someone we trade those guys for improves our defense to the point where a bad backcourt can survive defensively as league average.I agree we have sucked by design the last two seasons. Hands down we're a playoff/play-in team without trading 2+ rotation guys at each deadline and building our rotations around winning now, vs. our second half tank-a-thons.
I expect that tide turns this offseason/next season. No harm in seeing how a Lauri/Sexton/Keyonte offensive trio competes over the course of a competitive season + (hopeful) playoff run. 2 more years of team control on a very reasonable contract for Sexton, so if it's a bust, we can always trade him for real value.
My unanswered questions are:
1) Is a Sexton/Keyonte backcourt just too small and porous defensively?
2) Do we really have "that guy" within that trio to build a championship contender around? Superstardom has proven to be an essential ingredient for NBA championships in recent decades.
Maybe Keyonte ultimately becomes a trade chip to get you that star next to Sexton/Lauri. Maybe you get lucky and Sensabaugh/Hendricks/Keyonte/some guy you draft in the future turns into that player.