What's new
By:

Sirkickyass, Moderator.

From the "ethics" portion of the California State Bar exam:

After an lengthy interview with a wealthy client, you find, after he has left, that his wallet, containing $10,000, is stuck between the cushions of the chair he was sitting in.

Ethical question: Do you tell your partners, and split the booty with them, or simply pocket the cash?
 
Hopper said:
Congratulations on your self-imposed restraint there, eh, Kicky? Looks like maybe you have matured-up a little.
Click to expand...

I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree Aint. Even if I spotted every part of your original post I don't there's an implication that I would be corrupt. But thanks for flattering me.

Hopper said:
From the "ethics" portion of the California State Bar exam:

After an lengthy interview with a wealthy client, you find, after he has left, that his wallet, containing $10,000, is stuck between the cushions of the chair he was sitting in.

Ethical question: Do you tell your partners, and split the booty with them, or simply pocket the cash?
Click to expand...

Everyone knows the rule about finders keepers.

Also, 10k in a wallet? How would that thing even fold with that much paper stuffed inside? You'd have to transfer it to your own safe out of practical necessity.
 
Of all the people on this board, I think I know the mods the best -- that is, I've probably dealt with and dished out more **** than anyone else. That being said, I have nothing but respect for the lot of them. OneBrow and Tink (I would say bigb, but we're RL friends and that would be gay) are by far the fairest bunch of tools I've come across. Even Bronco70 and Brooklyn, who hate anything associated with me, are fair and balanced. If you had to suffer through the days of JazzTraveler and JG (I love you guys, but wow...) then you would appreciate how great it is to have mods that aren't complete hacks.



I'd still rather have Vinylone, but whatever.
 
Hopper said:
My personal view has been that Kicky has traditionally projected one of the most blustering, bullying, pretentious and smug personalities on this board.
Click to expand...

1. Not really
2. Occasionally, though I wouldn't necessarily use the term "bully"
3. Getting warmer
4. Agreed

However, it's often you come across as such when you're edumacated and dealing with the masses.
 
Raspberry Delight said:
I'd still rather have Vinylone, but whatever.
Click to expand...

Well, Bum, if you want Vinny, that's my cue to once again start-up my campaign for a mod position. I would be far more better than that hack, I figure. My platform (to be fleshed out in the future, but for starters, ya know?):

1. I promise to be the most immoderate moderator in the history of the interent.
2. I will treat all complaints about violations of the rules equally and without any discrimination whatsoever. My response to such complaints will always be: "What rules?"
3. Once in office, I will scheme to become treasurer, and will thereafter kick down to all the homeboys who voted for me.
4. My policy will be: After 14,000 warnings, you will get another warning. As promised in plank number 2, I will issue no warnings, but it's possible that mods I can't control will issue some.
5. I will ask nothing further for my self-sacrifice and dedication to the good of the board beyond the requirement that everyone address me as "His Majesty, the grand imperial wizard."

What's not to like, I ax ya!? Vote early and vote often. Thank you for your support.
 
That was so unfunny, it was actually awkward.



Congrats on being the first poster with a negative reputation though, that's got to count for something.
 
Francis Bacon was once accused of corruption as a judge on account of routinely taking bribes, and all. He adamantly disputed these charges, astutely pointing out that he always took bribes from both sides, and could not therefore be unduly influenced in favor of one side or the other. What some might call "corruption," I just call "bidnizz," my own damn self.
 
Hopper said:
Francis Bacon was once accused of corruption as a judge on account of routinely taking bribes, and all. He adamantly disputed these charges, astutely pointing out that he always took bribes from both sides, and could not therefore be unduly influenced in favor of one side or the other. What some might call "corruption," I just call "bidnizz," my own damn self.
Click to expand...

You call yourself "bidnizz?" I thought you called yourself Hopper, or aint, or something else entirely?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top