What's new
By:

Small trade idea

This has been mentioned a few times before. I could also be talked into trading the #9 for Minny's two later picks. I don't think there's much of a difference between the players that will be available 9-16.

But I also don't think Miller/KOC want to take on a guaranteed 3-yr deal for a player drafted in the 20's. Utah hasn't exactly been that effective in judging talent down around that spot. I think KOC and Sloan would rather sign a vet at the minimum to fill a roster spot than go with a rookie.

I'd do it, though. Babbitt/Hayward/Henry/George at the #12. One of those guys will still be there. Then perhaps a Sanders or Brackins with the 2nd pick.
 
I'd be (a little) more interested if it was for for the 12 and one of the 1st 5 picks of the 2nd. I hate those late 1sts. You get a guy you're locked into 1st round guarantees for that only has a tiny chance of working out. On draft day, all the experts talk about how great you did. 3 years later, those same experts can't remember who you drafted. If KOC had a big enough list of guys who fit both ranges, I could live with the risk. But he better be right.
 
billyshelby said:
I'd be (a little) more interested if it was for for the 12 and one of the 1st 5 picks of the 2nd. I hate those late 1sts. You get a guy you're locked into 1st round guarantees for that only has a tiny chance of working out. On draft day, all the experts talk about how great you did. 3 years later, those same experts can't remember who you drafted. If KOC had a big enough list of guys who fit both ranges, I could live with the risk. But he better be right.
Click to expand...

I agree that it would be better to have one of the first 5 of the second round than the last 5 of the 1st round - is there a team that has a pick in the 10-15 range of the 1st that also has a pick in 1-5 range of the second round? I haven't looked.
 
If it meant we could get Aldrich or Paul George with the the #12 pick and Larry Sanders with #25, then this trade would be awesome.
 
This is a great idea--someone should notify KOC so he can scout those late first round & early second round players.

Larry Sanders, Ryan Richards, Gani Lawal, Craig Brackens,
 
I've been trying to invent ways of turning our pick into two first-round picks for a while now. I think this gets a lot juicier if you start thinking about how we can turn #25 into number 15-20. We have the future Memphis pick, KK2, and Tomic to throw around. If you can get BOTH of these deals done then I think it is a no-brainer.
 
Sirkickyass said:
A small idea that I find intriguing. Not certain I'd do it yet and might not agree to it until draft day when I've seen who's around at the #9 slot, but I believe given the trading partner that it could be agreed to on the spot next week.

Utah trades #9 to Memphis.

Memphis trades #12 and #25 to Utah.

Why for Memphis: Utah can credibly claim to be interested in Luke Babbitt. Memphis wants Luke Babbitt (per Chad Ford's piece today as well as draftexpress). Memphis has three picks in the first round. Even after the trade they still have #9 and #28 so the cost of doing business isn't too high for them and they get the guy they want.

Why for Utah: Depending on whom you believe between Chad Ford, Draftexpress, or nbadraft.net, it appears that either Cole Aldrich or Xavier Henry will fall to #12. Both players (pending the outcome of the present Big Board vote) appear to be favored over Babbitt at least on this board. If the front office feels the same way they can collect an additional first rounder and still come up with a better outcome than Babbitt.

The #25 pick could have a number of prospects the Jazz have already worked out, such as Larry Sanders and Damion James. Or we could probably get Archie's favorite Dwayne Wade type scorer Willie Warren. :p

While I know we generally poo-poo trade threads I think this one is a lot more realistic than most. Feel free to let me know if I'm crazy for thinking so.
Click to expand...

Good idea that's been proposed before. Personally though, the draft is deep in bigs so to move down just three spots and take a big early which is a risk anyway (though Aldrich is the least riskiest pick) is a waste of a move to me. For me, we either try to move up to get one of the top 5, or stay pat, draft Babbitt (or move down and draft him) and get bigs later on. I know I'm a broken record here but I love Pittman and Foote (legit size, very strong respective skills) and acquiring them with 2nd rounder(s?) is the way to go imo. They have just as good a chance of being successful in the league as the Larry Sanders of the world imo.

However, take a big early and there's no intriguing wings in the 2nd who possess the qualities even remotely similar to earlier 1st round wings like Johnson or Babbitt imo.
 
Why not just go one step further and flip that #25 pick into picks in the first round? Either sell the #25 pick for $3mil and then buy 2 2nd round picks (numbers are from recent espn articles) for $1.5mil each or just trade the #25 for something like Milwaukee's 2 2nd's. I think that there is much more value in the 2nd round than at the end of the first (Bledsoe being available at #25 would make for a difficult decision, though).
 
I apologize if this deal has been proposed before, usually I'm pretty good about that. What set it off in my mind was the mention that Memphis really wanted Babbit and the ordering in the most recent mock drafts. I regarded that as new information that made such a deal plausible.
 
I'd rather have a top 5 pick in the 2nd round than one of the last 5 picks of the 1st round. Potential is about the same and the 2nd rounder isn't guaranteed anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top