What's new

so ebola possibly cured, when was the last time a disease got legitimately cured

[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];886160 said:
Why dont you answer my question instead making names and faces when I beat your stupid agenda to bloody pulp?

Why does National Autism Association blame autism on vaccine?



Nationalautismassociation.org/about-autism/causes-of-autism/


In 2001 Utah State University professor in the Logan city find link to vaccine for the MMR and autism. He publishes paper with collegues and testifies in US Congress to have child tested for autoimmune deficiency before vaccine. Medical Board says to him no, because this thing cost 100 US Dollars. That is so cheap in cost it will pay for itself in preventing autism. You know why they decline Professor Vijendra Singh? Because 1 in 68 will get autism from vaccine and the big pharma does not want to lose this business.

These are facts you need to read.

Why do they blame it? Mostly because the NAA is widely comprised of parents of children with autism that are struggling, and don't know the cause. Some parents can document regression after a vaccine, but many other children without vaccines show signs of autism at the same age. There is not enough evidence to prove otherwise. And the NAA still points towards all the other causes I mentioned as the main likely culprits, and they admit mainstream science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism. I didn't completely dismiss your statement, I just said there is not enough data to back it up. Based on what I have read, there are many reasons for autism including genetics. I read a study that showed older women having children, women not taking prenatal vitamins (or lacking proper nutrition) and certain drugs taken by the mother are the main causes. Even so, many mothers who avoid drugs and eat properly and take vitamins still have children with autism.

Now, I answered your question, now you answer mine. Are you a moron in a cage, or not? If you do not respond, I will assume you are.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];886160 said:
Why dont you answer my question instead making names and faces when I beat your stupid agenda to bloody pulp?

Why does National Autism Association blame autism on vaccine?

Who knows. It probably gets parents to wave their little fists and donate their money to them to do "research" on the issue. But "The American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine all agree that there's probably no relationship between autism and vaccines" (WedMD).

I can't believe everyone, myself now included, has succumbed to your trolling.
 
Why do they blame it? Mostly because the NAA is widely comprised of parents of children with autism that are struggling, and don't know the cause. Some parents can document regression after a vaccine, but many other children without vaccines show signs of autism at the same age. There is not enough evidence to prove otherwise. And the NAA still points towards all the other causes I mentioned as the main likely culprits, and they admit mainstream science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism. I didn't completely dismiss your statement, I just said there is not enough data to back it up. Based on what I have read, there are many reasons for autism including genetics. I read a study that showed older women having children, women not taking prenatal vitamins (or lacking proper nutrition) and certain drugs taken by the mother are the main causes. Even so, many mothers who avoid drugs and eat properly and take vitamins still have children with autism.

Now, I answered your question, now you answer mine. Are you a moron in a cage, or not? If you do not respond, I will assume you are.

You know why older women, people living next to freeway, and vaccines have in common? High levels of toxic heavy metals concentrations. How much more link do people need?

This thing is demonstrated but WHO and politicized group like CDC that are funded by big pharma through dirty politicians say it dont exist so I guess it dont exist.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];886180 said:
You know why older women, people living next to freeway, and vaccines have in common? High levels of toxic heavy metals concentrations. How much more link do people need?

This thing is demonstrated but WHO and politicized group like CDC that are funded by big pharma through dirty politicians say it dont exist so I guess it dont exist.

Huge Manboobs: All of my kids vaccines are mercury and preservative free. Yes, the have some metal and risks, but as I stated previously, the outweigh the cons:

Before the middle of the last century, diseases like whooping cough, polio, measles, Haemophilus influenzae, and rubella struck hundreds of thousands of infants, children and adults in the U.S.. Thousands died every year from them. As vaccines were developed and became widely used, rates of these diseases declined until today most of them are nearly gone from our country.
Nearly everyone in the U.S. got measles before there was a vaccine, and hundreds died from it each year. Today, most doctors have never seen a case of measles.
More than 15,000 Americans died from diphtheria in 1921, before there was a vaccine. Only one case of diphtheria has been reported to CDC since 2004.
An epidemic of rubella (German measles) in 1964-65 infected 12½ million Americans, killed 2,000 babies, and caused 11,000 miscarriages. In 2012, 9 cases of rubella were reported to CDC.

We know that a disease that is apparently under control can suddenly return, because we have seen it happen, in countries like Japan, Australia, and Sweden. Here is an example from Japan. In 1974, about 80% of Japanese children were getting pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine. That year there were only 393 cases of whooping cough in the entire country, and not a single pertussis-related death. Then immunization rates began to drop, until only about 10% of children were being vaccinated. In 1979, more than 13,000 people got whooping cough and 41 died. When routine vaccination was resumed, the disease numbers dropped again.

Again, I answer each one of your questions, but you refuse to answer my question. Are you a moron in a cage? Your failure to answer shows me you are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huge Manboobs: All of my kids vaccines are mercury and preservative free. Yes, the have some metal and risks, but as I stated previously, the outweigh the cons:

Before the middle of the last century, diseases like whooping cough, polio, measles, Haemophilus influenzae, and rubella struck hundreds of thousands of infants, children and adults in the U.S.. Thousands died every year from them. As vaccines were developed and became widely used, rates of these diseases declined until today most of them are nearly gone from our country.
Nearly everyone in the U.S. got measles before there was a vaccine, and hundreds died from it each year. Today, most doctors have never seen a case of measles.
More than 15,000 Americans died from diphtheria in 1921, before there was a vaccine. Only one case of diphtheria has been reported to CDC since 2004.
An epidemic of rubella (German measles) in 1964-65 infected 12½ million Americans, killed 2,000 babies, and caused 11,000 miscarriages. In 2012, 9 cases of rubella were reported to CDC.

We know that a disease that is apparently under control can suddenly return, because we have seen it happen, in countries like Japan, Australia, and Sweden. Here is an example from Japan. In 1974, about 80% of Japanese children were getting pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine. That year there were only 393 cases of whooping cough in the entire country, and not a single pertussis-related death. Then immunization rates began to drop, until only about 10% of children were being vaccinated. In 1979, more than 13,000 people got whooping cough and 41 died. When routine vaccination was resumed, the disease numbers dropped again.

Again, I answer each one of your questions, but you refuse to answer my question. Are you a moron in a cage? Your failure to answer shows me you are.

Most those people were malnourished. You know why we put iodine into salt and fortify the cereals? I mean, I would never take these synthetic vitamins but they are still vitamin that keep you from sickness. You could not get babannas and many important nuts back in the day and never essential vitamins that we only find in a few carribean or amazon trees.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];886180 said:
You know why older women, people living next to freeway, and vaccines have in common? High levels of toxic heavy metals concentrations. How much more link do people need?

Vaccines don't have high levels of toxic heavy metals.
 
Someone just asked if I was feeding the troll on purpose. I'm avoiding most of what I want to say, but every now and then, I can't keep myself from responding to a particularly common, dangerous lie.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];886683 said:
You have proof? What about living by freeway and older women from the deodorants? Do you throw away only one of these common scientific linkages or only one?

As people age, their various systems become less efficient, quite possibly including the systems for removing toxic metals, so it would not surprise me to learn that older people have higher concentrations of toxic metals (this has nothing to do with deodorants applied on the skin, which you did not mention in the previous post). When gasoline was leaded (and in countries where it still is), people who live(d) near a lot of gasoline exhaust breathed in a lot of lead, and lead is very bad for you. By contrast, vaccines have never had toxic concentrations of heavy metals.
 
As people age, their various systems become less efficient, quite possibly including the systems for removing toxic metals, so it would not surprise me to learn that older people have higher concentrations of toxic metals (this has nothing to do with deodorants applied on the skin, which you did not mention in the previous post). When gasoline was leaded (and in countries where it still is), people who live(d) near a lot of gasoline exhaust breathed in a lot of lead, and lead is very bad for you. By contrast, vaccines have never had toxic concentrations of heavy metals.

We do not have lead no more it is toxics from exhaust converter. Back when lead is in gasoline we do not have many vaccine or autism. Now we have more vaccine more autism. I do not think you can blame on lead my friend.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];887117 said:
We do not have lead no more it is toxics from exhaust converter. Back when lead is in gasoline we do not have many vaccine or autism. Now we have more vaccine more autism. I do not think you can blame on lead my friend.

All he said was lead is bad for you, he gave no correlation to lead and autism. Although I heard you ate lead chips as a child. Vaccines were widely prevalent when lead was still in gasoline, and in fact vaccines had more mercury in them then (which many believe can be an autism trigger--again, I haven't seen data to back that up). I hope you get out of moron gulag soon.
 
Vaccines don't have high levels of toxic heavy metals.

Vaccines have aluminum in them, but trace amounts. A baby that drinks forumula ingest far more (about 10x more IIRC) aluminum than they get from all of their vaccines.

I'm surprised they give you internet in the moron gulag.
 
Vaccines have aluminum in them, but trace amounts. A baby that drinks forumula ingest far more (about 10x more IIRC) aluminum than they get from all of their vaccines.

I'm surprised they give you internet in the moron gulag.

Do babies drink milk through their veins? Does formula contain inflammatory property that make translocation of otherwise non-permeable peptide into carrier molecule for vaccine bad stuff to cross blood-brain barrier like Professor Andrew Wakefield proved?

You sound indoctrinated by mainstream liberal media my friend. Keep lapping up their lies like a good progressive subordinate.


Anyways this is stupid. Nobody with brains would feed a children baby formula poison. Not natural type chernyye compound is toxic to mitochondria. This iz why USA children are so lazy and sit on couches all day.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];887238 said:
Do babies drink milk through their veins? Does formula contain inflammatory property that make translocation of otherwise non-permeable peptide into carrier molecule for vaccine bad stuff to cross blood-brain barrier like Professor Andrew Wakefield proved?

You sound indoctrinated by mainstream liberal media my friend. Keep lapping up their lies like a good progressive subordinate.


Anyways this is stupid. Nobody with brains would feed a children baby formula poison. Not natural type chernyye compound is toxic to mitochondria. This iz why USA children are so lazy and sit on couches all day.

Do you get visitation rights in the moron gulag?
 
All he said was lead is bad for you, he gave no correlation to lead and autism. Although I heard you ate lead chips as a child. Vaccines were widely prevalent when lead was still in gasoline, and in fact vaccines had more mercury in them then (which many believ can be an autism trigger--again, I haven't seen data to back that up). I hope you get out of moron gulag soon.

Hey man I will take answer from guy who can answer with brains and convince. You, you always right no matter you don't read the sciences.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];887242 said:
Hey man I will take answer from guy who can answer with brains and convince. You, you always right no matter you don't read the sciences.

Maybe in gulag you don't get full access to research. When do you get released from prison?
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];887238 said:
Do babies drink milk through their veins? Does formula contain inflammatory property that make translocation of otherwise non-permeable peptide into carrier molecule for vaccine bad stuff to cross blood-brain barrier like Professor Andrew Wakefield proved?

You sound indoctrinated by mainstream liberal media my friend. Keep lapping up their lies like a good progressive subordinate.


Anyways this is stupid. Nobody with brains would feed a children baby formula poison. Not natural type chernyye compound is toxic to mitochondria. This iz why USA children are so lazy and sit on couches all day.

Wakefield was a fraud, pure and simple. Do you understand that he cherry-picked his subjects and cooked his results? You understand that he was paid by lawyers who were organizing a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers, and was actually GIVEN HIS TEST SUBJECTS BY THEM? This flies against everything that science is about, his name has become a synonym for falsification of data, and his results have been discredited to the point that the journal they were published in has apologized.

You're either an idiot, a troll, or an idiotic troll.
 
Wakefield was a fraud, pure and simple. Do you understand that he cherry-picked his subjects and cooked his results? You understand that he was paid by lawyers who were organizing a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers, and was actually GIVEN HIS TEST SUBJECTS BY THEM? This flies against everything that science is about, his name has become a synonym for falsification of data, and his results have been discredited to the point that the journal they were published in has apologized.

You're either an idiot, a troll, or an idiotic troll.

You lap up main stream media reports my friend.

Group funded by pharma drug cartel says he is fraud so this must be true. Dont ask any question just condemn.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];888268 said:
You lap up main stream media reports my friend.

Group funded by pharma drug cartel says he is fraud so this must be true. Dont ask any question just condemn.

Every group who has studied it said he was a fraud. EVERY ONE. As well as the courts. He personally tortured children, and can be held responsible for the resurgence of multiple diseases eradicated in the developed world. People are dying because of him.
 
Back
Top