What's new

So gay!!!

Kicky maybe you shuld start drawing pictures. But in the case of gay anal sex one partners sexual organ is not even involved in the act. Which sexually speaking is opposite in my opinion.
 
Kicky maybe you shuld start drawing pictures. But in the case of gay anal sex one partners sexual organ is not even involved in the act. Which sexually speaking is opposite in my opinion.

Jesus Christ, you wouldn't even give a courtesy reach around?

I like how you include "gay" in "anal sex" because married heterosexual people wouldn't ever go for a little raspberry delight, now would they? They'd just be mimicking homosexuals, and it wouldn't count as intercourse.
 
Last edited:
it is really pissing me off that the limitations of this system are preventing me from giving rep points where rep points are due.

did you miss it entirely, Bean?

thanks Billy!
 
I just got home from the sperm bank...

green6-holding-breath-0409-lg-9421077.jpg
 
I believe gays are that way because of environmental factors. It worries me that alot of gay people have been sexually molested as children. I also believe that homosexuals can sometimes just have gender disorder issues. You see this in gay men that are extrememly feminine or females that are "dykes". But I dont deny they are attracted to the same sex. But I understand that homosexuality does not have any biological or evolutionary function. I am for civil unions so they have equal rights. But I am more concered with respecting the process of procreation.

Do we really need more people in the world? Is that a concern? Seriously.
 
Do we really need more people in the world? Is that a concern? Seriously.


Well there is that certain religion, very popular in Utah and surrounding areas, whose members seem to think having a dozen kids and overcrowding our schools is a good way to ensure your passage to the afterlife.

But this isn't about religion! Of course not! This is about the sanctity of marriage! And SCIENCE!
 
Well there is that certain religion, very popular in Utah and surrounding areas, whose members seem to think having a dozen kids and overcrowding our schools is a good way to ensure your passage to the afterlife.

But this isn't about religion! Of course not! This is about the sanctity of marriage! And SCIENCE!

Bigot.
 
Well there is that certain religion, very popular in Utah and surrounding areas, whose members seem to think having a dozen kids and overcrowding our schools is a good way to ensure your passage to the afterlife.

But this isn't about religion! Of course not! This is about the sanctity of marriage! And SCIENCE!

I really don't care much for this discussion, however, being a member of this religion I'm not sure where you're getting your information from. Whether you're unable to have kids or have 100 kids, this doesn't effect your salvation at all.
If you find members of this religion having too many offspring, then one should probably look at the sexual habits of the couple rather than blame it on some made up doctrine.

Unfortunately, too many members make up their own crap and too many observers believe it as doctrine. Examples: Mormons can't drink coke, Mormons can't watch tv on Sundays, Mormons have too many kids because it's a commandment.

And by the way, I'm repulsed at the amount of tax cuts married families with millions of kids get here in Utah. If you're going to have kids then you should pay for them. It's a part of using your "free agency" and taking on the accountability of your choices. If you choose to have sexual intercourse with your spouse without using birth control, then don't expect me to pay for the results of your consequences.

It's hilarious how so many Utahns hypocritically oppose Obamacare saying that it's "unconstitutional" that they be forced to pay for services of someone else. Yet, I'm paying out of my *** in taxes to help subsidize families who refuse to use birth control.
 
Back
Top