So gay!!!

[prodigal punk]

In your opinon. I base social and environmental choices and opinions based on principles of our natural world and its functions. I believe marriage is a social concept based on basic natural biology.

As I said above, which you completely ignored, humans are not subject to all the laws of natural biology. Our heightened state of consciousness allows us to live outside of most of the laws that animals are subject to.

 

[Beantown]

You probably don't always buy name-brand tylenol, yet I'd be willing to bet you call the knock-off "tylenol" nonetheless. That is, the medicine you buy can mimic the tylenol name and function, but it is not tylenol, yet you and I would still call it "tylenol."

Biological principles dont work that way. But you can twist science or ignore it if it makes you feel better.

 

[KM32MVP]

In your opinon. I base social and environmental choices and opinions based on principles of our natural world and its functions. I believe marriage is a social concept based on basic natural biology.

So, marriage for you is based on the "principals of our natural world." Meaning the ability to procreate?

 

[Beantown]

This "Champion of Evolution and Biology" shtick is sophomoric. People are not going to stop ****ing because homosexuals are allowed to be married or have a civil union. You are playing this game because it is a lot easier (in your mind) to defend than the underlying reason, which is the religious side of it. Its easier to invoke the name of science than it is to say that some guy that humans made up and wrote about in a book thousands of years ago said it is naughty, so it should be against the law. Its not up to the gov't to decide what is morale and make it lawful. Its up to us to decide, as individuals, and its the government's job to decide what is infringing on our rights as individuals and protect those civil liberties. That's what happened here. A judge decided that the law, though passed, violated a specific group of individual's rights, as set down by the 14th amendment.

But a judge cannot change basic biological facts no matter what the decision.

 

[billyshelby]

I've never seen such a heroic effort to teach someone 2 and 2 equals 4. At some point you have to rub the temples on your fivehead and move on. But it is fun to read.

 

[Beantown]

So, marriage for you is based on the "principals of our natural world." Meaning the ability to procreate?

All heterosexuals can marry because basic science shows their union has biological and evolutionary components.

 

[One Brow]

Again, homosexuals cant have sexual intercourse, they can only mimic sexual intercourse. The mans sex organ works with a female sex organ and vice versa. This is not true for homosexuals.

I expect you to change your positions when you can't defend them.

So, you define sexual intercourse as being male/female genital contact, and then say two males or two females can't experience male/female contact. How completely circular and irrelevant.

 

[Beantown]

I've never seen such a heroic effort to teach someone 2 and 2 equals 4. At some point you have to rub the temples on your fivehead and move on. But it is fun to read.

I know, the more they keep talking the more they think biology will change for them.

 

[One Brow]

I've never seen such a heroic effort to teach someone 2 and 2 equals 4.

Sort fo like trying to teach Giricek to be a good baseketball player.

 

[billyshelby]

I know, the more they keep talking the more they think biology will change for them.

Right? I'd help you out with this but I don't want to steal your thunder. You've got it well handled.

 

[Scat]

Since one side is proclaiming different treatment, that side needs to justify the difference.

So you agree with me. Gay marriage proponents need to justify the changes in society that they are requesting.

 

[KM32MVP]

So you agree with me. Gay marriage proponents need to justify the changes in society that they are requesting.

What would you consider adequate justification?