The Blazers have some real complications being over the Luxury Tax and couldn't take back Kevin Love. So nix that idea.
I'm not sure you Win a title if McCollum is a starter on your team, unless you're golden State. He's a great offensive talent but it just doesn't help when you score and then give up 2 more on other side... I'd stay with Mitchell higher upside.
Top 30? I'm not so sure about that
^^^
Or George is apparently willing to sign an extension with Boston if Hayward goes there.
Hayward wants (wanted?) his buddies Hill and Ingles to return. The trade eliminates one or both from returning.
Is there a PF who moves the needle? Jazz could re-sign Ingles and trade for a PF. If Hayward commits, get Rubio, Beverley or even welcome back Hill, although I think he wants too much $ and too many years.
Light years ahead defensively. But to keep Hayward, does Lindsey have to do something for the "now" instead of the future? And looking back, would Cleveland have been better off keeping Wiggins instead of trading for Love. Mitchell isn't Wiggins, but infusing a team with good, young (and CHEAP) talent is often better than getting a high-priced vet on the downside of his career.Mitchell will be better than CJ/Love.
McCollum is an All Star-caliber player. It gives the Jazz a PG who can play on and off the ball, it encourages Hayward to stay, and it makes the Jazz a better team. But the Jazz would have to sit down with Hayward, see if that would move his meter and ask for 48 hours to get the deal done.