Were people outraged for our trading Brewer? Even though I was a Brewer booster for years, the emergence of Matthews with a minimally passable jump shot and defensive ability made Brewer less essential. Oh, and Utah got a first-rounder out of it, too.I find it hilarious that people were so outraged that we traded Brewer and now no one wants him back...and then I was fine with trading Brewer and am now one of the few that wants to bring him back on a cheap contract. I can't figure out who's doing it wrong.
I find it hilarious that people were so outraged that we traded Brewer and now no one wants him back...and then I was fine with trading Brewer and am now one of the few that wants to bring him back on a cheap contract. I can't figure out who's doing it wrong.
There is risk to every deal. My point is again there isn't much to prove that Matthews would have a one year wonder.
I find it hilarious that people were so outraged that we traded Brewer and now no one wants him back...and then I was fine with trading Brewer and am now one of the few that wants to bring him back on a cheap contract. I can't figure out who's doing it wrong.
What risk would that be? I'd call re-signing WM as a pretty low-risk deal. He seems to be a character guy, a hard worker, an athlete, and a player with potential--just one year in the NBA. More in the mold of Millsap. AK, Boozer, Okur, and Ostertag are players who would be more at risk to dog it after they get a big contract. And they did.I am not suggesting he will in fact turn out to be a one year wonder nor do I think there is no risk in other deals. What I am saying is that there is ADDITIONAL risk in giving Wes a contract that big, because he only had one solid year in NBA. Not even a great year, but OK, solid year.
What risk would that be? I'd call re-signing WM as a pretty low-risk deal. He seems to be a character guy, a hard worker, an athlete, and a player with potential--just one year in the NBA. More in the mold of Millsap. AK, Boozer, Okur, and Ostertag are players who would be more at risk to dog it after they get a big contract. And they did.
Utah should let Matthews go only if they can get a viable starting SG elsewhere for less. Lots of teams play two or three or four times as much for their SG. Go through the NBA's starting lineups; maybe better players elsewhere, but 300% better? I say no.
Matthews is at around CJ's level, and it took Wes only one year, vs. 3 or 4 years for CJ. That's a positive sign to me. Right now, Matthews is probably a more focused Brewer defensively, and he has a jump shot. Any player who is respectable on both ends of the floor is worth considering.