[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];886013 said:
Care to elaborate? I can't wait to hear how your argument hinges on this distinction.
I agree with the bulk of what you're saying, I just bristle at the idea that increased contact between a woman and men is something to get immediately cautious about. After all, you basically don't know anything about them as people.... you're just basing this off some 'universal law of the sexes'. In other words, it's lol.
I know you think you're really smart, witty, and cutting, but Judas H. Priest, you're awful. Using your brilliant train of thought, the daycare on the corner shouldn't be worried that someone who enjoys watching kiddy porn just moved in next door. "After all, you basically don't know anything about them as people.... you're just basing this off some 'universal law of the sexes'. In other words, it's lol." In other words, you're a moron.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];886016 said:
another classy post in this thread.
jazzfanz can be a total ****hole.
So sayeth the biggest *** hat and least funny poster on the board, Amen. (PBUH)
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];886020 said:
Making fun of stereotypes is cool when the joke has at least one thread of originality. Some would say that it's best when you aren't making fun of a category that absolutely excludes you. Yours was the most obvious one at-hand, and at some distance from you. You can make fun of stereotypes all you want, but it's another thing to do that AND be "classy." You didn't thread that needle.
There's so much irony here that Bruce Dickinson is currently filing suit for plagiarism.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];886065 said:
again, braugh, you can make bad jokes all you want. For example, jokes like the one you told in this thread. I can also point out how stupid it was.
Academia. 4. Life. (it's not too late to drop out, kids)
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];886158 said:
I'm willing to bet the only thing he's sorry about is getting into a discussion with you. It's like arguing gay rights with BeanDowns, Craig1221, and kkkarolina all at the same time, only worse; at least those three know they're stupid.
*Don't pretend that your posts are so crystal clear
As far as I can see, you're the only person who didn't get it. Keep back peddling, tool belt.
Reflection again?
*the fine-grained distinction between professionalism and focus is yours... your nut to crack... I don't think we know enough about the internal workings of SAS's FO, the players as people, Becky as a person, etc. to make your distinction actionable. I think that's obvious.
In short, he answered your idiotic question with concise Pwnage, and your mini-E-peen can't stand the idea of losing face to people that you claim are stupid and beneath you, yet you constantly seek their satisfaction and validation. I didn't even need my high school education to figure that one out.
*keep assuming if you want
I assume you're pretty much worthless. How refreshing.