What's new

Start Mitchell at the Point.

I think I’ve continually strained at how infrequently Q seems to use all this “positional flexibility” we seem to have. And at how he seems totally committed to the idea that “you dance with who you brought” on any given night.

For example: Royce. Somehow, that dude can be a drastically different player, night-to-night. But if Q plans on using him, then he gets good burn, regardless of which Royce shows up. If he isn’t in the gameplan, then he doesn’t seem to get to extra minutes.

Extra minutes where, you ask? How about as a small-ball 4 on a night where Jae can’t throw it in the ocean? Positional flexibility, right?

We almost tossed last night into the trash bin... and dammit, it was because of a type of stubbornness that irritates me.

I used to make reference to a key difference in coaching by comparing Mike Shannahan and Bill Belichick. Shannahan was a “my system” guy; he’d shoehorn guys into unnatural roles and his imagination seemed limited. Belichick is way better at adapting and molding gameplans around the skills in the locker room. Anywhooo.... I’m starting to get a bit uncomfortable with how often Q is making me think of Shannahan. We seem to have a tight enough locker room that if a player gets the hook on any given night because they’re sucking the wang, then we aren’t going to implode.

Q, use your deck, dude.

Pretty short handed I could see why he stayed with Crowder... How did Royce play 27 minutes and not get one shot off?

Strange night. Sometimes you have to win a rock fight.

I do think Royce is more of a small ball four than a 2 guard and I still think Crowder should start (can play off DM/Rudy/Joe and spot up instead of gunning off the bench). I think Favs would do better off the bench if he was fresh, but may be wrong.
 
I am surprised Favors didnt come back in. Its not like Jae was hitting shots so Favors would have been better on defense and better on cleanup duty on offense.
Because Jae is better at defending closely on the perimeter.

If Blake is taking Jae down in the post, he's going to have a lot of help from Gobert. Yeah, Favors might guard him better down low, but he isnt contesting the 3 as well and that's what has the better chance of hurting you.
 
Because Jae is better at defending closely on the perimeter.

If Blake is taking Jae down in the post, he's going to have a lot of help from Gobert. Yeah, Favors might guard him better down low, but he isnt contesting the 3 as well and that's what has the better chance of hurting you.
I disagree with that. Favors was great all game on Blake, even on the perimeter. He is almost every time he guards him. Plus Favors guarding Blake rarely needs help. Jae needed help most of the time since he could easily back him down. I think Jae did a good job, just not as good as Favors. Did Blake score once on Favors in that game?
 
Because Jae is better at defending closely on the perimeter.

If Blake is taking Jae down in the post, he's going to have a lot of help from Gobert. Yeah, Favors might guard him better down low, but he isnt contesting the 3 as well and that's what has the better chance of hurting you.
This may be true in general (but I’m not sure), but it wasn’t true last night.

And that’s kinda my point.
 
Pretty short handed I could see why he stayed with Crowder... How did Royce play 27 minutes and not get one shot off?

Strange night. Sometimes you have to win a rock fight.

I do think Royce is more of a small ball four than a 2 guard and I still think Crowder should start (can play off DM/Rudy/Joe and spot up instead of gunning off the bench). I think Favs would do better off the bench if he was fresh, but may be wrong.
I was confusing in my last post. Royce was trashy last night, too.
 
We don't need Rubio AND Exum. One needs to go because I'm fine with Neto and eventually Grayson as emergency options.

So between Rubio and Exum, who goes and when?
I think Cy made a good point (forget if it was in this thread or another thread) where he basically said that if the Jazz make a trade at the deadline for a big contract guy (e.g. Porter Jr) then Rubio probably stays, but if the Jazz don't make a move then he'll likely be let go in the offseason.

My preference is Exum starts at PG with Neto there as well for some bench minutes, but I'm biased.
 
I think Cy made a good point (forget if it was in this thread or another thread) where he basically said that if the Jazz make a trade at the deadline for a big contract guy (e.g. Porter Jr) then Rubio probably stays, but if the Jazz don't make a move then he'll likely be let go in the offseason.

My preference is Exum starts at PG with Neto there as well for some bench minutes, but I'm biased.

If we get some wing/PF option upgrade, I'm with Cy. We probably do need to keep Rubio.

However, I'm on the Exum train. Rubio's upside simply isn't that high. His great games happen too infrequently.

In my opinion, we need to be shopping Rubio and Favors at the deadline. We love them both, but I don't think either are essential to winning a title. If we miss them that badly, we can bring them back later on next season or something.
 
Regardless of the stats (which can be misleading especially on small sample sizes)... what I HAVE NOT missed are games where Rubio starts by dominating the ball, going 0-9, and ending the quarter with <4 assists.

I am tired of games where we start out by spotting the opponent 20 points!

I am tired of Rubio being touted as a great defender even though he can't stay in front of his man.

So, DM starting has been a welcome change. If rubio isnt the option moving forward then I wouldn't be too upset based on performance.
 
Regardless of the stats (which can be misleading especially on small sample sizes)... what I HAVE NOT missed are games where Rubio starts by dominating the ball, going 0-9, and ending the quarter with <4 assists.

I am tired of games where we start out by spotting the opponent 20 points!

I am tired of Rubio being touted as a great defender even though he can't stay in front of his man.
I see exactly the same thing you do and I'm also tired of the same thing and hopefully this ends very soon.
 
Rubio in December and January, 17 games:
FGM/FGA
9/13
5/10
5/13
11/23
5/13
2/5
3/14
5/10
0/8
10/15
5/11
5/11
1/10
6/17
6/13
6/13
4/5 in 5 minutes. Injured

30/33 FT% 90
88/205 FG% 43
24/65 3P% 37

Umm, not bad numbers at all. Just two of those games can really be considered garbage offensively (0/8 & 1/10).
I think it's safe to say that there's an unjustifiable anti-Rubio crowd that got stuck with the idea that Rubio needs to be shipped, and there seems to be no way of turning it around. He could have a great comeback and playoff run and the haters would still want his *** out of here. It's become rather amusing at this point tbh.
 
Rubio doesn't have to go, but I think most would agree that he doesn't have to start and definitely doesn't have to play 30 minutes per game.

Oh, and if he stays this summer, we shouldn't give him some Favors type overpay deal. If we do overpay, the anti- Rubio sentiment will only grow when he has his usual slow start next season.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top