What's new
By:

Stoked versus Northeast

northeast said:
Your first sentence is incomplete so has no clear meaning....Everything after that I have already addressed previously, and you are just wanting me to go around in circles rehashing the same disagreements that we have already covered. if you really want to continue to extend this waste of time longer, I will request that you make one point at a time. You are going off in multiple directions , extending a spiders web of meaningless ness.,
Click to expand...

Yes it does.

I am not wanting you to go around in circles, I am simply aiding you in doing so. You did it for a full work day earlier this week. I will not limit myself to one point at a time to accomodate your inability or unwillingness to address more than one point at once. IF you cannot keep up then I suggest that you stop trying.

As for addressing everything in previous posts I doubt that is the case. Would you care to back up your assertion or will you continue with baseless assertions? I will even give you two places to start (yes more than one).

Where have we covered the ineffectiveness of your insults?

Where did we cover your lack of conviction or your deviousness?
 
It is not a matter of me not being able to keep up, it is a matter of you throwing vague jumbled crap on the wall and expecting me to make sense out of it for you. Apparently, I said something in my last post that you disagreed with, but you have not made clear what it is.
You can start by explaining wtf this sentence of yours is supposed to mean: "Would you please indicate where I have ever even attempted to?"
 
northeast said:
It is not a matter of me not being able to keep up, it is a matter of you throwing vague jumbled crap on the wall and expecting me to make sense out of it for you. Apparently, I said something in my last post that you disagreed with, but you have not made clear what it is.
You can start by explaining wtf this sentence of yours is supposed to mean: "Would you please indicate where I have ever even attempted to?"
Click to expand...

So you failed to notice the part of your reply that I had quoted. The failure is indeed yours.
 
This argument is kind of like. Depends on what the definition of is, is?

You guys really know how to argue. I am impressed.

I am also impressed that you guys are 8 pages deep on this. I would like to see if this thing can go 100 pages. At that point we will have to the judge's score cards, for a decision.

Carry on.....
 
BluesRocker said:
This argument is kind of like. Depends on what the definition of is, is?

You guys really know how to argue. I am impressed.

I am also impressed that you guys are 8 pages deep on this. I would like to see if this thing can go 100 pages. At that point we will have to the judge's score cards, for a decision.

Carry on.....
Click to expand...

In 2 minutes I am out of here for a few days. I may post the rare occasional post during that time. I mostly waste idle time on here.
 
First sentence is not.
Second is, but Stoked can simply agree to and abide by this proposal if he wants to, and prove me wrong.
 
Last edited:
northeast said:
First sentence is not.
Second is, but I think I am right.
Click to expand...

Right, Professor. I'm fully aware that the first sentence, by itself, is not conjecture. It was included to provide context for the second sentence.

To be perfectly honest, I don't care whether you're right or not. I just threw that in because you were going on about conjecture.
 
Bronco70 said:
Right, Professor. I'm fully aware that the first sentence, by itself, is not conjecture. It was included to provide context for the second sentence.

To be perfectly honest, I don't care whether you're right or not. I just threw that in because you were going on about conjecture.
Click to expand...

This is all just semantics
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top