I just don’t get what is so controversial about me stating I would be a little wary of French A League prospects due to them not producing any decent let alone good NBA players in over a decade.
I get the league doesn't make the prospect but if the league had enormous amounts of NBA talent then it would be producing prospects. Its just like how Cal's system doesn't make prospects either... but a lot of NBA talent comes through that program.A league does not make prospects.
Good to see the brand is going strong.It's not xenophobia
You keep saying its not because they are French... like that is the argument... its more nuanced and reducing it down like that is a bad look.You can't just say I'm the one tying to them being French lol. Like, saying that does not change the fact that this entire conversation. Why do you even bother making comments like that? Saying it in a post does not change the entire discussion and make it true. Seriously lol.
And there you did it again... lol. The point of contention is the French league that some of the guys have played in doesn't produce a lot of NBA talent... but sure its just about them being French and ignore the general details.Do you think I keep comparing Bilal to Exum because Exum is French? I think you know the answer to that. This entire time, my point is that you cannot connect them on the basis of being French alone and it's lazy to do so.
If you're trying to make the argument that Frank and Bilal are similar because they are similar prospects based on basketball reasons that is one thing. I disagree, but at least that is an argument based on basketball. The point of contention is if Bilal is overrated on the basis of being French.
Yes... its incredibly stupid to compare similar prospects, with similar production, in the same league... when similar assumptions about their skill level/development were assumed... How ****ing dumb.It's not xenophobia, but directing comparing production across leagues is just being plain stupid.
It comes down to being incredibly lazy once again. This idea that two prospects who put up similar basic box score stats must be similar players.
$$$ and copy cat syndrome (and the prospects have slowed down for Cal because players realized it isnt all that great).I get the league doesn't make the prospect but if the league had enormous amounts of NBA talent then it would be producing prospects. Its just like how Cal's system doesn't make prospects either... but a lot of NBA talent comes through that program.
IMO you don't need the next step. Low production in any reasonable league should be viewed with skepticism. And it's the low production that's making you skeptical not the league. That's why you would have picked Wemby 1st even thought he's coming from the same league and same team.Right but the next level connection that some of us are making is putting those two things together. Low production in that league. That kind of production in college does not land you in the lotto but if you are in a pro league its assumed there is more to offer. Its not Xenophobic though lol. So drafting those guys high has a rough history... does not mean it has to repeat though.
If Bilal was doing Luka **** or Wemby **** well that's different.
You keep saying its not because they are French... like that is the argument... its more nuanced and reducing it down like that is a bad look.
And there you did it again... lol. The point of contention is the French league that some of the guys have played in doesn't produce a lot of NBA talent... but sure its just about them being French and ignore the general details.
I'm xenophobic against deep dish. Get that **** out of here.Hey you guys. Stop fighting for a moment and take a look at the this nice hot pizza pie.
View attachment 14893
If I say Bilal is drafted high and it's not because he's French, I am directly stating that he is not being drafted high because he is French. I can't even comprehend how you could interpret that differently. How can I say that Bilal was drafted high for reasons that are not being French? Maybe someone can assist, I don't know how to dumb it down more.
I have said over and over that comparing two players on the basketball things, like low production, makes sense. Comparing them simply on the basis of being French, does not make very much sense. I would agree that reducing a player down to being French is stupid, which is what I have been saying since the start of this discussion. Until I figure out how to communicate this I do not know where to go from here.
Right... but production like that in college will get you basically disqualified from being considered a first round pick... so the only time it would get you picked is in one of the adult overseas leagues. So I would think in that evaluation of the limited prospect you would consider the history of that and similar leagues. Whether its French or Euro league it doesn't necessarily matter... I agree. But you can really only evaluate the tools if the play/production is low... So thats a recipe for these kinds of mistakes/busts and I don't think its a coincidence that its a route with little to no success. Its okay to connect the ingredients there. Its a bet I'd still take with Bilal in the teens or 20s but at 7?IMO you don't need the next step. Low production in any reasonable league should be viewed with skepticism. And it's the low production that's making you skeptical not the league. That's why you would have picked Wemby 1st even thought he's coming from the same league and same team.
Just evaluate the guy's play and tools and production... and from then on you can decide for yourself if there are circumstances that excuse that production or provide context that makes you think he might be an outlier. As I said above, I think there are things that make me think there's a chance he turns into an amazing player... but I don't think the chance is very high.