Short version. Of course, in classic Archie Moses style, you'll deny any responsibility for the contents of what you post. You're just not capable of doing your own research. I just wish you were adult enough to own up to your support for this type of stuff, rather than going through the pretense of being unsure.
I just read this. How much of this is true and how much is bs?
"Here's what I learned from listening to the hearings from Ford and Kavanaugh:
1) Ms. Ford stated she did not come forward for political reasons and has not been paid to come forward. Fact check: There are 3 known GoFundMe accounts in her name totalling nearly $1,000,000 dollars. She does not plan to return the money, nor has she told people not to send money.
In what way is this a fact check?
2) She testified that she and her husband went to a therapist in 2012 while remodeling their home. They were arguing over installing a 2nd front door which she stated under oath, that she wanted as an escape route. Fact check: A check of Palo Alto building permit records show the 2nd door was installed in 2008. The record states the 2nd door was added as a separate entrance for a rental unit being developed in the home.
In what way is this a fact check?
Accurate.
4) She doesn't know or remember how she got home which was 8 miles away. No one has come forward to take credit for taking her home.
The entire city they lived in is only five miles across.
11) She said she heard people talking about her at the party after the incident. She doesn't know or remember what they were saying. Questions: How did she hear them talking about her if she fled the house? How does she know they were talking about her if she doesn't know or remember what they were saying?
She locked herself in the bathroom before she fled the house, and overheard conversations in there.
12) All of the witnesses that she named have provided statements saying it never happened, and also vouched for the good character of Kavenaugh.
None of the witnesses have claimed it never happened, they say they don't remember that night.
13) Ford said she called her friends on her cell phone when she got home to tell them what had happened. She stated the party was in 1982. Fact check: The first cell phone was not available for sale until 1984.
Ford never claimed to use a cell phone.
14) Feinstein was deceptive and violated the rules of the judiciary committee by keeping the letter secret from the chairman and other committee members for 60 days. She never questioned Kavanaugh about it when she met with him before the confirmation hearings.
Deceptive, maybe (there is such a thing as respecting privacy). At any rate, who cares? Why is Feinstein's behavior relevant here?
15) Someone leaked the letter to the press. The only people who had the letter were Ford, her lawyer, Feinstein, and the Democratic Senator from her state.
Incorrect. Besides, Feinstein *is* a Democratic Senator from Ford's state. The paper that published the letter confirmed it did not come from Feinstein's office.
16), 17), 18), 19), 23), 24)
So?
20) Her attorney claims to be handling the Ford case pro bono but was hired by Feinstein.
Any reason both can't be true?
21) Kavanaugh was very passionate in his denial, as anyone would be under a false accusation that is destroying his reputation, his family and children, and his career.
As anyone would be facing a true charge that would deny him a seat on SCOTUS that he felt belonged to him. Works both ways.
22) He likes beer and drank in high school at the legal age of 18.
False. By the time Kavanaugh turned 18, it was illegal for 18-year-olds to drink, and Kavanaugh drank before he was 18.
25) The Republicans questioning Ford were respectful.
The Republicans hired a prosecutor to question Ford. They were absent.
26)The Democrats were not respectful of Kavanaugh and didn't really ask any questions other than to try to get him to ask for an FBI investigation.
Anyone who saw the interview knows this is a lie.
1) I think both statements were presented in a believable manner, but the burden of proof is on the accuser, and that didn't happen.
There is no burden of proof; this is not a court of law.
I'm about to have a heart attack and die from the level of surprise.
3), 5), 6), 7), 8), 11), 12)
So?
4) Her behavior leading up to the hearing appears to be staged and calculated. She appears to have been coached.
Whatever supports your view of the world.
9) I believe that Kavanaugh's display of righteous anger is a justified response to this serious accusation.
I would be surprised if the writer felt otherwise.
10) I believe Feinstein and the Democrats are using mentally weak Ford as a political pawn.
This would not be complete without an insult to the victim.
