What's new
By:

Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to Retire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Catchall said:
Might be related to the fact that they were both minors? Not sure. She would still need some real evidence to support her allegation. She could have gotten a complaint drawn up and filed weeks or months ago though.
Click to expand...

Perhaps the inevitable mountains of judgment that would be poured down upon her? Claims that she is only seeking money, etc.
 
ONE LOVE said:
Um, so if that's the best way to do it why don't courts accept written statements? Why does anyone have to testify?
Click to expand...

This wasn't a trial, it's a hearing where were supposed to learn about the nominees positions on laws and such.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One Brow said:
The state of Arkansas requires a woman to report the name of her rapist when she wants to call a hotline? I hope I got that wrong.
Click to expand...
If reported to a therapist or healthcare professional they have to make a hotline call.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Douchebag K said:
Both sides in your bizarre country are pretty unhinged dude

Embarrassing all round
Click to expand...

This was 100% a attempt to slander by the Democrats, they knew they have ZERO evidence so why even do this stunt? All the witnesses deny. I'm an impartial viewer not democrat or republican, the only string they have to hold onto for this crazyness to be remotely true since all the witnessess denie it happen is a supposed lie detector test, that's all that's left that can possibly collaborate this obvious stunt, then we find out this morning the questions that were asked, none of them included Kavanaugh's name?

This is 100% lunacy, all in an attempt by the dems to slander a guys name, delay the senate and the supreme court. They know they have nothing, and it's all damning to DNC, people with eyes to see are walking away. Anyway, y'all know my opinions, @Catchall is about the only person in this entire thread other than me with a brain it seems but I haven't read all posts and i'm not devoting any more time to this charade. Peace
 
Bulletproof said:
I think that if I had personal knowledge of a person nominated for the Supreme Court doing something that absolutely disqualified them then I'd be more motivated than ever to come forward even if I had remained silent before. That's not political, it's civic duty, and her civic duty was significantly greater once he was nominated.
Click to expand...

What about her civic duty to report a sexual predator to the police? If any of this was true....
 
rare144 said:
What about her civic duty to report a sexual predator to the police? If any of this was true....
Click to expand...

Now you’re just being confrontational now. Everyone knows there’s a high % of sex crimes not reported due to the high emotion trauma inflicted on the victims. Idiot!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Now you’re just being confrontational now. Everyone knows there’s a high % of sex crimes not reported due to the high emotion trauma inflicted on the victims. Idiot!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...victims-sexual-harassment-come-forward-sooner
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...victims-sexual-harassment-come-forward-sooner
It's 2018, and it's shameful to not know why victims don't come forward immediately. Readall of these, rub them up against "this man is going to take another chance at my body"
 
rare144 said:
This was 100% a attempt to slander by the Democrats, they knew they have ZERO evidence so why even do this stunt? All the witnesses deny. I'm an impartial viewer not democrat or republican, the only string they have to hold onto for this crazyness to be remotely true since all the witnessess denie it happen is a supposed lie detector test, that's all that's left that can possibly collaborate this obvious stunt, then we find out this morning the questions that were asked, none of them included Kavanaugh's name?

This is 100% lunacy, all in an attempt by the dems to slander a guys name, delay the senate and the supreme court. They know they have nothing, and it's all damning to DNC, people with eyes to see are walking away. Anyway, y'all know my opinions, @Catchall is about the only person in this entire thread other than me with a brain it seems but I haven't read all posts and i'm not devoting any more time to this charade. Peace
Click to expand...

But why would the dems do this? Couldn't the people who pick the supreme court judges just choose someone else that the democrats dont like instead?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page
Back
Top