What's new
By:

Tank move: Andrew Bynum

Thee jazz fan said:
Yes because doing this trade is guarantied to get us Parker, hell we could just as easily get Wiggins Parker Embiid or Randle without having to give up Burks or Marv, who could be a very usefull role player when we finish the tank business at 3-5 million playing both sf and stretch 4 off the bench. I'd rather have Burks and one of those guys than one of those guys with no Burks and potentially no Hayward.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
Click to expand...

So instead of increasing the chance of landing a franchise changer by ~20% or so you'd rather keep a guy around to be a role player on a hypothetical contender 3-4 years down the road? I view Marvin as having nice window coverings on a house you're currently trying to build. We laid the foundation and started framing some of the walls. We realized we need a bit more space so we're laying more foundation. Now don't get me wrong, we want window coverings and we want them to be badass, but until then get your feet out of the gravel and GTFO of the way so the cement truck can get in.
 
infection said:
So instead of increasing the chance of landing a franchise changer by ~20% or so you'd rather keep a guy around to be a role player on a hypothetical contender 3-4 years down the road? I view Marvin as having nice window coverings on a house you're currently trying to build. We laid the foundation and started framing some of the walls. We realized we need a bit more space so we're laying more foundation. Now don't get me wrong, we want window coverings and we want them to be badass, but until then get your feet out of the gravel and GTFO of the way so the cement truck can get in.
Click to expand...

Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!

If it was just Marv and Jefferson I'd be all for it. Did you read any of my posts. My hate of this trade has nothing to do with Marv.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Yes because doing this trade is guarantied to get us Parker, hell we could just as easily get Wiggins Parker Embiid or Randle without having to give up Burks or Marv, who could be a very usefull role player when we finish the tank business at 3-5 million playing both sf and stretch 4 off the bench. I'd rather have Burks and one of those guys than one of those guys with no Burks and potentially no Hayward.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
Click to expand...

How do you figure that we will have a chance at Wiggins, Parker, or Randle?
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!

If it was just Marv and Jefferson I'd be all for it. Did you read any of my posts. My hate of this trade has nothing to do with Marv.
Click to expand...

It's ok, I have stupid analogies for Burks, too. It's like the guy who goes on Who Wants to be a Millionaire and gets stumped after winning $500 and, rather than shooting for something a little higher, feels compelled to take the sure bet because, "I came in here with nothing and now I'll be leaving with $500!"

We can all use $500 bucks. Especially me and especially now. But I think it's time to throw all the coal in the fire.
 
He sure seemed to like it when we played the Lakers in the playoffs all those series.

Anyways, Bynum will be broke in 5 years, and will have found a "new found love" for the game when he goes to play in China.
 
Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is retarded beyond all belief. Thank the heavens that none of you make decisions for this franchise.

Why would Cleveland do this?
Click to expand...
Cause they can't possibly be that stupid. Cleveland would jump on this faster than a rapper on a bad lyric.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top