...Meanwhile here in reality:
Key US inflation measure surges at fastest rate since June
The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge rose last month at its fastest pace since June, an alarming sign that price pressures remain entrenched in the U.S. economy and could lead the Fed to keep raising interest rates well into this year.apnews.com
Month-to-month is volatile, in reality. Inflation is receding overall, in reality.
Got it. According to you the media can accuse anyone of anything they want as long as what they report is simply that the subject has been accused of it, and in order to prove that they are accused all we have to do is accuse them. If you had evidence of the Trump children similar to the Hunter stuff I'm certain you would share it, but all you are really doing is accusing them of having been accused of doing it, so well done. And huge LOL that you are unaware of a lack of reporting on the laptop. Had there been no conservative media, which many people never hear, the public wouldn't have heard a single thing about the contents of the laptop until long after the election, and there is a good chance that story would have been successfully and permanently buried. But the bottom line is, you have proven again and again that you far more interested in seeking loopholes in wording and wiggle room in admissions rather than applying the truth and justice equally. There is absolutely no point in interacting with you any more.
I agree the "Agent Hutchinson heard this on the rumor mill" isn't a particularly significant story, and neither should have been the pee tape in the Steele dossier.
Why would I do that? What point could it serve? You're not going to change your position on the legality of the contents of the supposed laptop download based on something as minor as Trump's kids doing scummy-yet-legal stuff, AFAICT.
No, the scummy stuff is real enough, but it's legal.
You mean, because Giulliani withheld the contents of the laptop's download from every major media source until well after the election?
The bottom line is you have a picture of the world generally, and me specifically, that you aren't interested in changing. One prime example is that I would try to protect Joe Biden, another is that I have some motivation to attack Trump's kids.
As you wish.
...because Congress didn't have the constitutional power to impeach a private citizen who was not in office. Joe Biden became president on January 20, 2021. and the sham they labeled as Trump's second impeachment trial began on February 9, 2021. I find it Orwellian that those who clearly disregarded constitutional limits on power are lauded as protecting the constitution, while those who observed the limits set forth in the constitution were said to be against the constitution. I do not subscribe to the burn-the-village-to-save-it logic.
I associate meatballs with sweden too, so it is doubly offensive in addition to being great.
John Stockton
chicago.suntimes.com
