The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

[Gameface]

You're so terrible at this, you left in the comma, indicating there was more to see. D- trolling.

View attachment 14507

Again, nothing in those pictures/passages stimulated erotic feelings in me. Did they do that for you?

Welp AIO is a straight up malicious liar. We have the receipts. Who could have guessed?

****ing clown.

I've shown my *** on this website more times than I can count, but I've never destroyed my integrity anywhere close to this. If I did I would quietly go away and try to forget I ever had a jazzfanz.com account tbpfhwy.

 

[Gameface]

Oh, since we're doing definitions, here's one I found for a malicious lie

The statement must be published maliciously. Malice is defined as a statement made by a party who knows that the statement is false or is reckless as to its truth. Being negligent as to the truth of the statement is not enough, or if the words are published in good faith, even if they are false.

AIO knew his statement was false. He intended to defame our friend One Brow with this known misrepresentation. He absolutely intended to mislead other forum users with a purposefully incorrect, in fact manipulated representation that was presented as coming from an authoritative source.

The word scumbag comes to my mind at this very moment.

 

[Gameface]

@Mods

You know how I have 4 banners under my name for being a paid user and a 3 time all jazzfanz winner? Well I think @AI-O-Meter needs a "liar liar pants on fire" banner hung on his profile. It seems more than appropriate.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

nothing in those pictures/passages stimulated erotic feelings in me. Did they do that for you?

If you are going to argue intentions, then it isn't you or me that matter. It is the intentions of the producer of the work, and the producer of this work has been crystal clear the intended audience is the demographic that would find one boy blowing another to be sexually arousing. Even by the definition you want to use, it is still pornography.

 

[Bucknutz]

I think the topics are too advanced for 5th graders.

I asked you twice and you still will not answer the question. Some vague response, trying to answer but actually not. So it’s a waste of time to debate you.

Just because you are not being titillating by the books doesn’t mean others are not. You’re probably desensitized having lived a long life. Others who are starting to get those feelings and looking at graphic books might get them all worked up. So yes it’s pornography to some. Safetydan called it porn right from the start.

 

[One Brow]

If you are going to argue intentions, then it isn't you or me that matter. It is the intentions of the producer of the work, and the producer of this work has been crystal clear the intended audience is the demographic that would find one boy blowing another to be sexually arousing. Even by the definition you want to use, it is still pornography.

Your credibility here is zero. In a quick search, I saw a lot of conservatives calling it sexually arousing, which is pretty creepy IMO. I didn't find anywhere Kobabe said so.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Your credibility here is zero. In a quick search, I saw a lot of conservatives calling it sexually arousing, which is pretty creepy IMO. I didn't find anywhere Kobabe said so.

Then you didn't look very hard. Kobabe is all over everywhere saying the book was intended for a young gay and non-binary audience. It was intended for the target demographic what would find one boy blowing another to be arousing. Even by the definition you want to use, it is still pornography.

 

[One Brow]

I asked you twice and you still will not answer the question. Some vague response, trying to answer but actually not. So it’s a waste of time to debate you.

I've been very clear that I don't have an issue with the material being available for 7th and 8th graders, and it is not appropriate for 5th graders (which you quoted me on). I've been clear that the answer for elementary school libraries depends upon whether the school has 7th-8th grade. I'm pretty sure you're smart enough to understand the concepts. I think you're getting emotionally overwrought.

Just because you are not being titillating by the books doesn’t mean others are not. You’re probably desensitized having lived a long life. Others who are starting to get those feelings and looking at graphic books might get them all worked up. So yes it’s pornography to some. Safetydan called it porn right from the start.

I see. I agree you should stop debating this with me, and work through your feelings.

 

[Bucknutz]

Then you didn't look very hard. Kobabe is all over everywhere saying the book was intended for a young gay and non-binary audience. It was intended for the target demographic what would find one boy blowing another to be arousing. Even by the definition you want to use, it is still pornography.

Crazy, let’s see the intended readers age…


Oh adults…why is it schools? Why does a 13 year old need this book to be in the public school library? Why can’t they get it somewhere else if they really need to read it?

 

[One Brow]

Then you didn't look very hard. Kobabe is all over everywhere saying the book was intended for a young gay and non-binary audience.

I agree on the intended audience. That doesn't support the intention to write a sexually explicit book. For most people, knowing that people are gay and/or non-binary is not sexually arousing in and of itself. Maybe that's your kink?

It was intended for the target demographic what would find one boy blowing another to be arousing.

You have provided zero evidence for this, as expected.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

I saw a lot of conservatives calling it sexually arousing, which is pretty creepy IMO.

As a side note, I'm disappointed that you aren't more open and have resorted to gay bashing those who may be exploring some things.

 

[Bucknutz]

I've been very clear that I don't have an issue with the material being available for 7th and 8th graders, and it is not appropriate for 5th graders (which you quoted me on). I've been clear that the answer for elementary school libraries depends upon whether the school has 7th-8th grade. I'm pretty sure you're smart enough to understand the concepts. I think you're getting emotionally overwrought.

You still didn’t answer the question for the third time. Calling out people for not being credible. You have 0 credibility. You cant even answer a basic question. I’ll ask you again, one last time.

Should this book be banned in elementary schools?

I see. I agree you should stop debating this with me, and work through your feelings.

Stupid reply with no substance. More evidence of your 0 credibility.