What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Our country is becoming infected with Taliban-like fervor. People in Congress should be censured for using "religion". Anyone who supports The Rapist after Jan. 6/the big lie is treasonous and the use of religion in the attempt to convince Americans that those type of actions are legal or even pious is a threat to democracy. We need good GOP representatives like Turner and McCaul to stand up and censure people like Marge and Gaetz and Cruz. This has to be stopped.
And for what?

Afghanistan is a weird tribal country besieged by decades and decades of war, poverty, and misery. Americans are turning to their own religious extremists over… what exactly? What’s so miserable about living here? The poorest Americans are still better off than 99 percent of those who live in Afghanistan. Can you think of a worse place to grow up in in the last 50 years? I can’t.

So why are Americans so miserable? Oh I get it, racial and sexual minorities have made marginal gains in society and we spend too much of our free time on screens that tell us that we should be angry.

Fascism all because a black man dared to win the White House in 2008 and because the Supreme Court said that gays could get married in 2015.

It really was an educational moment for me when my Trumpiest neighbor who kept his Trump 2020 flag up until well into 2022 told me last summer how angry he was over inflation and the economy. Later that day he took off in his monster truck and boat heading down to Powell for the weekend. His wife with hair extensions and nails done and all 3 kiddos riding in the cab with the newest tech devices. The guy has more than most Americans let alone people in Afghanistan. Yet, he’s angry. He feels cheated. He’s angry and resentful at the country that has given him so much.
 
I've said repeatedly it'll be our ultimate downfall. Social media in general is destructive to society and the human mind. The perfect addiction machine, turns kids brains to jelly from the moment they get their first iPhone. Does the same to adults but they just lose IQ points rapidly, believing everything they see. It's a mass of confirmation bias, driving prejudicial thinking and decaying social bonds, which has serious repercussions even IRL. It's a bane on humanity and will be instrumental in our final destruction.
Goodness gracious! I'd hate to hear what you think about Jazzfanz.
 
When you are shown to be a fool you have 3 options: shut up, back off the situation, or double down. The first two take some level of self-awareness. So is anyone surprised she took the third option?
Also worth noting there were watch parties all along the path of totality yesterday. People seemed to be experiencing joy, wonder, awe, shared community, but not so much fear and trembling. Marge is a little out of touch…
 
So why are Americans so miserable?
And why do people like MTG urge that we experience fear and a sense of foreboding during an event that, judging from the reactions in yesterday’s watch parties in the path of totality, seemed to be a once in a lifetime moment of wonder and joy, and shared community, and seeing our home’s place in the cosmos? Why do people like Marge urge us to feel frightened and alienated instead?
 
And why do people like MTG urge that we experience fear and a sense of foreboding during an event that, judging from the reactions in yesterday’s watch parties in the path of totality, seemed to be a once in a lifetime moment of wonder and joy, and shared community, and seeing our home’s place in the cosmos? Why do people like Marge urge us to feel frightened and alienated instead?
It's how they stay in power. Their base is mobilized by fear, and righteous indignation and superiority. It's what Christ taught. Always be afraid, we have no hope, except the fact that our religion makes us better than you so you better get in line.
 
Glad I’m not an Alpha male. Poor guys…”Real Men” vote Trump.


Nick Adams was speaking to the men in the room.

“Never apologize,” he said. “Never mask up. Never pick up the Fortnite controller. It starts with the Fortnite controller and boneless chicken wings, and ends in gender pronouns and communism. We don’t want that.”

“Damn right!” a young man in pleated khakis yelled. “Damn right, we don’t want that.”

The crowd chuckled. The affirmation was jokey, but serious — fitting for Adams, a happy culture warrior whose weapon of choice is not a video game controller but an X account, “Nick Adams (Alpha Male),” where he professes his love for Hooters, makes goofy claims like how billionaire pop superstar Taylor Swift is only dating NFL tight end Travis Kelce because she wants a piece of his $70,000 Super Bowl bonus check, and posts videos about boycotting Mars candy because M&M’s had committed “egregious sexism” for having all-female packaging. He calls his fans Nick Adams Disciples, or “Nads.”
 
It's how they stay in power. Their base is mobilized by fear, and righteous indignation and superiority. It's what Christ taught. Always be afraid, we have no hope, except the fact that our religion makes us better than you so you better get in line.
Good post. Is that how all religions operate? Or all Christian religions operate? Why aren’t we seeing the same anger, hate, fear, and resentment from black evangelicals or Catholics? Why are white Christians in general and white evangelicals in particular so angry and fearful? If it’s about actual persecution, then I’d think Muslims would be the most “Trumpy.”

What should angry religious sects and denominations adopt from other religious sects and denominations to chill the **** out?
 
It's how they stay in power. Their base is mobilized by fear, and righteous indignation and superiority. It's what Christ taught. Always be afraid, we have no hope, except the fact that our religion makes us better than you so you better get in line.
Obviously it was more of a rhetorical question, lol…
 
Food for thought.



Here's a wild thought experiment: What if we've been deceived into thinking we're more divided, more dysfunctional and more defeated than we actually are?

Why it matters: Well, there's compelling evidence we've been trapped in a reality distortion bubble — social media, cable TV and tribal political wars — long enough to warp our view of the reality around us.

The big picture: Yes, deep divisions exist on some topics. But on almost every topic of monthly outrage, it's a fringe view — or example — amplified by the loudest voices on social media and politicians driving it.

  • No, most Christians aren't white Christian nationalists who see Donald Trump as a God-like figure. Most are ignoring politics and wrestling with their faith.
  • No, most college professors aren't trying to silence conservatives or turn kids into liberal activists. Most are teaching math, or physics, or biology.
  • No, most kids don't hate Israel and run around chanting, "From the river to the sea." On most campuses, most of the time, students are doing what students have always done.
  • No, most Republicans don't want to ban all abortions starting at conception. No, most Democrats don't want to allow them until birth.
  • No, immigrants who are here illegally aren't rushing to vote and commit crimes. Actual data show both rarely happen — even amid a genuine crisis at the border.
  • No, most people aren't fighting on X. Turns out, the vast majority of Americans never tweet at all.
  • No, most people aren't cheering insults on Fox News and MSNBC in the evening. Turns out, less than 2 percent of Americans are even watching.
 
Food for thought.



Here's a wild thought experiment: What if we've been deceived into thinking we're more divided, more dysfunctional and more defeated than we actually are?

Why it matters: Well, there's compelling evidence we've been trapped in a reality distortion bubble — social media, cable TV and tribal political wars — long enough to warp our view of the reality around us.

The big picture: Yes, deep divisions exist on some topics. But on almost every topic of monthly outrage, it's a fringe view — or example — amplified by the loudest voices on social media and politicians driving it.

  • No, most Christians aren't white Christian nationalists who see Donald Trump as a God-like figure. Most are ignoring politics and wrestling with their faith.
  • No, most college professors aren't trying to silence conservatives or turn kids into liberal activists. Most are teaching math, or physics, or biology.
  • No, most kids don't hate Israel and run around chanting, "From the river to the sea." On most campuses, most of the time, students are doing what students have always done.
  • No, most Republicans don't want to ban all abortions starting at conception. No, most Democrats don't want to allow them until birth.
  • No, immigrants who are here illegally aren't rushing to vote and commit crimes. Actual data show both rarely happen — even amid a genuine crisis at the border.
  • No, most people aren't fighting on X. Turns out, the vast majority of Americans never tweet at all.
  • No, most people aren't cheering insults on Fox News and MSNBC in the evening. Turns out, less than 2 percent of Americans are even watching.
I see where he's coming from. But the problem lies in the fact that those making real policy decisions that affect us in our real lives are on the fringe in this regard. So the fringe opinions are becoming policy, and thereby becoming actual reality. I'm sure he's right about what most Americans in those groups really want and feel and believe, but when the fringes are in power, the danger and division becomes very real.

Also the vote would indicate that even if most Americans don't support the full fringe platform, they sure as hell vote for those that do. That's at minimum tacit approval which, in reality, may as well be full espousal. How else do we end up with laws that criminalize a 10 year old rape victim crossing state lines to get an abortion from the baby of her rapist, for example.
 
I see where he's coming from. But the problem lies in the fact that those making real policy decisions that affect us in our real lives are on the fringe in this regard. So the fringe opinions are becoming policy, and thereby becoming actual reality. I'm sure he's right about what most Americans in those groups really want and feel and believe, but when the fringes are in power, the danger and division becomes very real.

Also the vote would indicate that even if most Americans don't support the full fringe platform, they sure as hell vote for those that do. That's at minimum tacit approval which, in reality, may as well be full espousal. How else do we end up with laws that criminalize a 10 year old rape victim crossing state lines to get an abortion from the baby of her rapist, for example.
Don’t disagree with you. But I look at it this way. Not minimizing alarm or sense of real danger, but I think reactionary movements, in the 21st century, are doomed to fail, in the long run. But, it’s getting to that long run that may be destructive of our body politic. Certainly concerned about a Trump 2.0, and Project 2025. I am not concerned about America returning to the 19th century. In the long run. We’ve had reactionary spasms before. The anti-Catholic, ant-Irish Know Nothing Party put people in Congress in the 1850’s, as one example.

Yes, radical right elements may haunt us if Trump wins. I think we’re in for a hellish experience whoever wins in November. But, in the long run, anti-science, willful ignorance, controlling women, conspiracism and irrational beliefs, all these foolish reactions will fail. Truth will triumph over lies. I will choose to believe that, even though I’m no spring chicken, so not sure I’ll live to see it. Consider all the unbelievable lies and nonsense presented by MAGA, and I cannot imagine such a state being the case in this country for too long, before it is swept into the dustbin of history. There is absolutely nothing inspirational, unifying, or uplifting in spirit about any of it. And, as such, it won’t win.

In the long haul, people will not hang their national identity on fear and anger.
 
How else do we end up with laws that criminalize a 10 year old rape victim crossing state lines to get an abortion from the baby of her rapist, for example.
We have kidnapping laws that prevent movement of minors across state lines without consent of the parent, but there is no law criminalizing a parent taking their kid across state lines even if the purpose of the journey is to get an abortion. Get out of your silo. You live in cuckooland. The fringes do not have ruling authority in the United States.
 
Don’t disagree with you. But I look at it this way. Not minimizing alarm or sense of real danger, but I think reactionary movements, in the 21st century, are doomed to fail, in the long run. But, it’s getting to that long run that may be destructive of our body politic. Certainly concerned about a Trump 2.0, and Project 2025. I am not concerned about America returning to the 19th century. In the long run. We’ve had reactionary spasms before. The anti-Catholic, ant-Irish Know Nothing Party put people in Congress in the 1850’s, as one example.

Yes, radical right elements may haunt us if Trump wins. I think we’re in for a hellish experience whoever wins in November. But, in the long run, anti-science, willful ignorance, controlling women, conspiracism and irrational beliefs, all these foolish reactions will fail. Truth will triumph over lies. I will choose to believe that, even though I’m no spring chicken, so not sure I’ll live to see it. Consider all the unbelievable lies and nonsense presented by MAGA, and I cannot imagine such a state being the case in this country for too long, before it is swept into the dustbin of history. There is absolutely nothing inspirational, unifying, or uplifting in spirit about any of it. And, as such, it won’t win.

In the long haul, people will not hang their national identity on fear and anger.
I think largely you are right. There is the possibility this spirals into something worse before it gets better, as happened at the civil war or in the fascist states in the early 1900's. I like to think the odds of that are slim here but we are in uncharted waters with the unparalleled access to social media and the 24/7 propaganda and indoctrination machines the likes of which we've really never seen before. Time will tell the power of these new complicating factors, but we need to continue to be aware of the dangers ahead of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
I’ve been told that high grocery prices, not racism, turns off voters. If true, then I have no idea why anyone would vote for Trump. Especially since I’ve been reassured by good folks on the right that they’re not motivated by racism. And I’ve been told that voters are truly feeling the inflation squeeze and not just repeating the narrative they’ve been fed by a media desperate for another season of the Trump show.

IMG_4670.png
 

—-As pollsters, we look at a variety of metrics when assessing an election. One of these includes what Americans are most worried about, what we call the “main issue.” These indicators have interesting properties. Empirically, candidates strongest on the main problem win the election 85% of the time. We pay special attention to this metric as the campaign unfolds–whoever owns the main issue will typically win the election. Take Biden and COVID-19 in 2020, George W. Bush and national security in 2004, or Bill Clinton and the economy in 1992.

—-Presently, our polling shows that “political extremism or threats to democracy” leads the pack in first place at 23% in importance with “the economy” and “immigration” roughly tied for second at 19% and 17%, respectively. “Threats to democracy” is an issue that Biden dominates. It was a key theme for Democrats in the 2022 midterms and will be a central one in 2024. In our research, it serves as a strong proxy for the anti-Trump vote. In contrast, “immigration” is a Trump and Republican issue. Trump won on it in 2016 and used it to govern throughout his administration.

—However, with the main issues–democracy and immigration–so close in importance, things can change.

—Considering our 85% rule (that the main issue is critical in determining electoral outcomes), the implications here are clear. If “threats to democracy” stays the number one issue, Biden is likely to win the election. Biden has a 12-percentage point lead over Trump on democracy. If it is immigration or the economy, the odds will shift back toward Trump. Trump has an average 8-percentage point lead over Biden on these issues.

—Critically, we believe the polling industry is producing false positives. Most polling shops do not have “political extremism” or “saving democracy” as attributes in their most important problems questions.

—However, in the experimentation that Ipsos has done, we see that adding “political extremism or threats to democracy” as a main worry significantly shifts what Americans cite as their chief concern compared to more typical main issue questions. Because of this oversight, most public pollsters show “immigration” as the dominant issue of the day. The market right now has a blind spot and is not capturing a critical concern among the public.
 

—-As pollsters, we look at a variety of metrics when assessing an election. One of these includes what Americans are most worried about, what we call the “main issue.” These indicators have interesting properties. Empirically, candidates strongest on the main problem win the election 85% of the time. We pay special attention to this metric as the campaign unfolds–whoever owns the main issue will typically win the election. Take Biden and COVID-19 in 2020, George W. Bush and national security in 2004, or Bill Clinton and the economy in 1992.

—-Presently, our polling shows that “political extremism or threats to democracy” leads the pack in first place at 23% in importance with “the economy” and “immigration” roughly tied for second at 19% and 17%, respectively. “Threats to democracy” is an issue that Biden dominates. It was a key theme for Democrats in the 2022 midterms and will be a central one in 2024. In our research, it serves as a strong proxy for the anti-Trump vote. In contrast, “immigration” is a Trump and Republican issue. Trump won on it in 2016 and used it to govern throughout his administration.

—However, with the main issues–democracy and immigration–so close in importance, things can change.

—Considering our 85% rule (that the main issue is critical in determining electoral outcomes), the implications here are clear. If “threats to democracy” stays the number one issue, Biden is likely to win the election. Biden has a 12-percentage point lead over Trump on democracy. If it is immigration or the economy, the odds will shift back toward Trump. Trump has an average 8-percentage point lead over Biden on these issues.

—Critically, we believe the polling industry is producing false positives. Most polling shops do not have “political extremism” or “saving democracy” as attributes in their most important problems questions.

—However, in the experimentation that Ipsos has done, we see that adding “political extremism or threats to democracy” as a main worry significantly shifts what Americans cite as their chief concern compared to more typical main issue questions. Because of this oversight, most public pollsters show “immigration” as the dominant issue of the day. The market right now has a blind spot and is not capturing a critical concern among the public.
All of that is a nice story but the reality is that Joe Biden, or whomever the Democrats nominate, will win because the system is rigged. Even if Trump had a ten point lead on election day, the Democrat nominee will still win. Trump will not be president again, ever. We may not see a Republican win the White House for decades.
 
Top