You claim to work with data, and you don't understand the difference between a mean and a standard deviation?
The Climate Change Thread
- Thread starter str8line
- Start date
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
Sure. The mean is easy to convey using an anecdotal example while a standard deviation is a more abstract concept. For instance, the mean bra size in America in 2024 is a 34DD. Anecdotally, the American mean is this:
The standard deviation is about probabilities of being in other cup sizes which ends up looking like a line on a chart and is far less compelling to an audience.
Sardines
Well-Known Member
That bitch knows what time it is!Lol at that big *** watch
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
I know Trump is mean and is definitely a non-standard deviation.
FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
can't we at least just agree that all Lakers and Man Utd fans should be culled ??? The earth does not need those oxygen thieves around and that would be an awesome start to relieving the stress on mother earth.
Red
Well-Known Member
Not directly related to climate change, but the effort to “deconstruct the administrative state” would certainly include gutting the power of the EPA.
www.nbcnews.com
Conservative Supreme Court justices consider weakening federal agency power
The dispute arising from a fisheries regulation is the latest attack on the federal bureaucracy as part of what has been called a war on the administrative state.
www.nbcnews.com
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
Random fact, but did you know the one time head of the EPA was Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch's Mom?Not directly related to climate change, but the effort to “deconstruct the administrative state” would certainly include gutting the power of the EPA.
Conservative Supreme Court justices consider weakening federal agency power
The dispute arising from a fisheries regulation is the latest attack on the federal bureaucracy as part of what has been called a war on the administrative state.
Nepo baby, what?!?
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
Nepo baby - Wikipedia
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Seems like you used it wrong.Nepo baby - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Someone who worked in the EPA had a kid that worked in the supreme court.
If the kid would have ended up working for the EPA then that would make the kid a nepo baby according to the definition but since the kid worked in the supreme Court the nepo baby adjective is incorrect from what I can gather.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
It is just different shows in the same industry of the elite ruling class
Red
Well-Known Member
“Experts say the documents show the fossil fuel industry had intimate involvement in the inception of modern climate science, along with its warnings of the severe harm climate change will wreak, only to then publicly deny this science for decades and fund ongoing efforts to delay action on the climate crisis.
“These findings are a startling confirmation that big oil has had its finger on the pulse of academic climate science for 70 years – for twice my lifetime – and a reminder that it continues to do so to this day. They make a mockery of the oil industry’s denial of basic climate science decades later.”
www.theguardian.com
“These findings are a startling confirmation that big oil has had its finger on the pulse of academic climate science for 70 years – for twice my lifetime – and a reminder that it continues to do so to this day. They make a mockery of the oil industry’s denial of basic climate science decades later.”
‘Smoking gun proof’: fossil fuel industry knew of climate danger as early as 1954, documents show
Documents show industry-backed Air Pollution Foundation uncovered the severe harm climate change would wreak
www.theguardian.com