You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.
I'm with trigg3r.
Ok, carry on with your regularly scheduled liberal zombie apocalypse act.
You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.
I was simply passing on what ABC News said. Scat wrong? Take it up with ABC News.
What struck me is that after listing his [Obama] accomplishments over the past 4 years is that the economy is just as bad, if not worse, than the day he took office and there is no end in sight.
And if unicorns were real perhaps I would try to catch one and take it on a magical ride to the fairy kingdom! Let's not try to imagine what the other would do in an imaginary scenario. It is utterly pointless. What I think is important is what the president has done, not what the right imagines he says or believes. Not getting us involved in another war in the middle east, and taking out Bin Laden and upper level al qaeda operatives on a seemingly monthly basis. Compare that to the last commander in chief (whose foreign policy advisors are now advising Romney) and it's a pretty clear call. Oh! and lets talk about how the big evil media is a liberal conspiracy! Because that isn't played out.
You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.
Which egg is that?
Did you even read my post? Context. It is really not. that. difficult.
Not to mention, when it comes to national security I tend to lean towards those who actually get intelligence and are in a position to make decisions. It is far easier to play armchair commander in chief than it is to actually hold the position. I stand by my original assessment of the entire situation. This kind of thing should never be used as a political football and the more the right tries to use it as such the more disgusted I become.
And if unicorns were real perhaps I would try to catch one and take it on a magical ride to the fairy kingdom! Let's not try to imagine what the other would do in an imaginary scenario. It is utterly pointless. What I think is important is what the president has done, not what the right imagines he says or believes. Not getting us involved in another war in the middle east, and taking out Bin Laden and upper level al qaeda operatives on a seemingly monthly basis. Compare that to the last commander in chief (whose foreign policy advisors are now advising Romney) and it's a pretty clear call. Oh! and lets talk about how the big evil media is a liberal conspiracy! Because that isn't played out.
You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.
We are so much better off now than 4 years ago. I didn't even think it was debatable.
Once again, the greatest barometer on who is winning was in full force last night... FACEBOOK!
During the first debate? "Yeah Romney!"
First VP debate? "Biden keeps interrupting! Ahhhh he's smiling! He's so rude!"
Second Pres. debate? "Obama! You suck! I hate Obama! Ahhhhh! He's so smug! The moderator is an Obama fan!"
LOL
repubs won the first... Haven't won since!
The best candidates are showing through. Cream is rising to the top.
Housing construction up, and unemployment down.
Imagine what we could do with a united congress, and no extremists.
Well I hate to say I told you so......(actually I love saying it)
Dispatches from the print media:
Obama more aggressive
Obama goes on attack
Obama more assertive
Obama rebounds
Obama fiesty.
Obama forceful
While, overall, there may not have been decisive winner, the prevailing narrative leans heavily in Obama's favor due merely to the fact that he did better this time around. If Obama showed up in the first debate, NONE of these superlatives would need to be mentioned. In other words, exactly what I said would happen.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to stop typing so I can continue patting myself on the back.