What's new

The Debates

I was simply passing on what ABC News said. Scat wrong? Take it up with ABC News.

I thought you didn't trust ABC news?

It's funny how ABC news is the Bible when it says something that agrees with your agenda but is evil liberal garbage when it doesn't. You can't have it both ways. You can't find it credible one day and not the next.
 
I find this whole Libya exploitation thing hilarious.

Yep. A tragedy. It sucks that people died.

But the way the right is trying to exploit this truly shows how desperate they are... And how awesome Obama's foreign policy has been.

Compare that to the long list of foreign policy errors the Bush administration gave us that exploiters could easily exploit? HILARIOUS!

I'll take criticisms over Obama bowing to some arab dude and whether the attack on an embassy was spontaneous or planned any day over pissing off the Russians, pissing off the British, pissing off the Germans, starting 2 wars costing us trillions which will need to be paid off by our children and grandchildren, the worst terrorist attack in our history, etc...
 
What struck me is that after listing his [Obama] accomplishments over the past 4 years is that the economy is just as bad, if not worse, than the day he took office and there is no end in sight.

We are so much better off now than 4 years ago. I didn't even think it was debatable.

Once again, the greatest barometer on who is winning was in full force last night... FACEBOOK!

During the first debate? "Yeah Romney!"

First VP debate? "Biden keeps interrupting! Ahhhh he's smiling! He's so rude!"

Second Pres. debate? "Obama! You suck! I hate Obama! Ahhhhh! He's so smug! The moderator is an Obama fan!"

LOL

repubs won the first... Haven't won since!

The best candidates are showing through. Cream is rising to the top.
 
And if unicorns were real perhaps I would try to catch one and take it on a magical ride to the fairy kingdom! Let's not try to imagine what the other would do in an imaginary scenario. It is utterly pointless. What I think is important is what the president has done, not what the right imagines he says or believes. Not getting us involved in another war in the middle east, and taking out Bin Laden and upper level al qaeda operatives on a seemingly monthly basis. Compare that to the last commander in chief (whose foreign policy advisors are now advising Romney) and it's a pretty clear call. Oh! and lets talk about how the big evil media is a liberal conspiracy! Because that isn't played out.

You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.

Which egg is that?

Just in case you missed it.
 
Did you even read my post? Context. It is really not. that. difficult.
Not to mention, when it comes to national security I tend to lean towards those who actually get intelligence and are in a position to make decisions. It is far easier to play armchair commander in chief than it is to actually hold the position. I stand by my original assessment of the entire situation. This kind of thing should never be used as a political football and the more the right tries to use it as such the more disgusted I become.

Why did the Obama Administration turn it into a political football in the first place?


And if unicorns were real perhaps I would try to catch one and take it on a magical ride to the fairy kingdom! Let's not try to imagine what the other would do in an imaginary scenario. It is utterly pointless. What I think is important is what the president has done, not what the right imagines he says or believes. Not getting us involved in another war in the middle east, and taking out Bin Laden and upper level al qaeda operatives on a seemingly monthly basis. Compare that to the last commander in chief (whose foreign policy advisors are now advising Romney) and it's a pretty clear call. Oh! and lets talk about how the big evil media is a liberal conspiracy! Because that isn't played out.

You are right, you certainly aren't going to change anyone's mind with that kind of garbage.

The charge is that you are playing one-sided gotcha politics, thus your opinion is not worth reading.
 
Breaking news!

I just got it from ABC so don't blame me if you find it to be a bunch of crap! I got it from ABC!

In an attempt to jumpstart his campaign, Mitt has dumped Paul Ryan and has invited someone familiar to run with him!!!

Have ya'll missed me???

100618_sarah_palin_sunglasses_hat_ap_218.jpg
 
We are so much better off now than 4 years ago. I didn't even think it was debatable.

Once again, the greatest barometer on who is winning was in full force last night... FACEBOOK!

During the first debate? "Yeah Romney!"

First VP debate? "Biden keeps interrupting! Ahhhh he's smiling! He's so rude!"

Second Pres. debate? "Obama! You suck! I hate Obama! Ahhhhh! He's so smug! The moderator is an Obama fan!"

LOL

repubs won the first... Haven't won since!

The best candidates are showing through. Cream is rising to the top.

Most of your posts are extremely annoying, but I'll give you credit for the Facebook barometer comment.
 
Housing construction up, and unemployment down.

Imagine what we could do with a united congress, and no extremists.
 
Well I hate to say I told you so......(actually I love saying it)




Dispatches from the print media:

Obama more aggressive

Obama goes on attack

Obama more assertive

Obama rebounds

Obama fiesty.

Obama forceful

While, overall, there may not have been decisive winner, the prevailing narrative leans heavily in Obama's favor due merely to the fact that he did better this time around. If Obama showed up in the first debate, NONE of these superlatives would need to be mentioned. In other words, exactly what I said would happen.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to stop typing so I can continue patting myself on the back.
 
Housing construction up, and unemployment down.

Imagine what we could do with a united congress, and no extremists.

Man if only. We both know that is a pipe dream though.

For me personally I look at the "other" unemployment number.

God I want a person to run for office that is no BS and gives straight answers. I'd probably vote for them regardless of if I agree or not. At least I would know they are honest and know where they stand.
 
Well I hate to say I told you so......(actually I love saying it)





Dispatches from the print media:

Obama more aggressive

Obama goes on attack

Obama more assertive

Obama rebounds

Obama fiesty.

Obama forceful

While, overall, there may not have been decisive winner, the prevailing narrative leans heavily in Obama's favor due merely to the fact that he did better this time around. If Obama showed up in the first debate, NONE of these superlatives would need to be mentioned. In other words, exactly what I said would happen.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to stop typing so I can continue patting myself on the back.

Don't you have other things to do like working on your plans to burn your house down?
 
Back
Top