MVP
Well-Known Member
Go ahead and post it, if you really think this is the case.
I did. You are just ignoring the facts.
Go ahead and post it, if you really think this is the case.
Dante is as quick as you get. His first step perhaps unmatched.
Dante can get to the rim in traffic, and put the ball over people.
here is some rankings of fastest players in NBA
http://uproxx.com/dimemag/the-25-fastest-players-in-the-nba/7/
http://sokkaa.com/2017/05/23/top-8-fastest-players-in-the-nba-2016-17-season/3/
Now this is the game and I usually do not care much about it... but still they must watch the games!!!
https://www.sportskeeda.com/basketball/nba-2k-ratings-top-15-fastest-players-in-nba-2k16
Exum not in any of these rankings. I can't just wait for small market conspiracy theorists and fan boys to cry about it - "oh its UTAH, had he played on Lakers he would be ranked as faster then Westbrook"
Exum is just as fast with Mitchell dribbling the basketball and has better handles.
Westbrook actually had pretty average combine numbers
Until Dante learns what to do with his first step, he's going to continue to not be very good.
Look, there are a ton of people paid to project player development. And they are so often wrong. Then there are a ton of guys like you and me who have opinions. We can also be wrong.Right, because:
1) You were the only person that knew Kawhi would be THAT good.
2) Kawhi going to the situation he ended up in had nothing to do with his development.
Give me a ****ing break.
Your petty anti anything half positive about Exum seems a little pathological.
Truth hurts, I get it. Too bad you guys can't evaluate players objectively. Makes you look really desperate especially arguing with numbers/facts.
Lol, there is no objective way to evaluate players. If there were teams would get it right.Truth hurts, I get it. Too bad you guys can't evaluate players objectively. Makes you look really desperate especially arguing with numbers/facts.
Skip to nr. 1 dunk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj-iQvqz81E
I think he was wanting to see a dunk in traffic.
Lol, there is no objective way to evaluate players. If there were teams would get it right.
Combine numbers are meh at determining on court athleticism. Athleticism also greatly changes in your 20s. It also is based on how well trained you are to do the tests. You keep using a 3/4 Sprint test to determine quickness yet that is not what the test determines. Quickness is the first step or two, not the court. That is also out of a proper Sprint stance that never gets used in a game.
There are way more factors than some silly combine numbers from a kid just out of high school like Exum.
We could look at summer league to see how he progressed.
I think we're gonna look back at that Lyles over Booker pick as one of the major missteps....
I know hindsight is 20/20, but damn... 1 guys is a future All Star, another could be out of the league in 1-2 years.