Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
After trading Deron for rebuilding pieces, Utah could have justified going into a full rebuild, especially considering that even with Deron, that team had regressed to the point they were looking to miss the playoffs. No doubt a lot of fans would have been pissed. Just like the Moronic GS fans that booed their FO during Mullin's jersey retirement, because they didn't like a rebuilding move that traded the present for the future. I'm pretty sure every single one of those fans would be glad their FO ignored what the fan base thought. It would have been a gamble, just like it was gamble to risk losing 2 borderline all-stars for nothing, when the odds where greatly in favor that rebuilding was inevitable. Just how much we lost on our choice of a gamble remains to be seen.
Sure, but when Williams was traded, Harris had two more years. Jefferson had two more years. Millsap had two more years. Bell had two more years. Rebuilding would have required EVERYONE to go, something that wasn't guaranteed and if you failed to get rid of everyone, then you're hamstrung by the contract. Harris had been an all star, so there was hope the Jazz could compete. Couldn't have traded all of them at the deadline. Jazz had 4 lotto picks coming in the next year, so there was youth and experience. So even more hope that the Jazz could rebuild on the fly. Why tear it down even more when Hayward and Favors were going into their second year, and Kanter and Burks just got drafted? Then the lockout happened, which made deal making incredibly difficult before the season started, then that year the Jazz made the playoffs, giving the Jazz front office more hope that this rebuild would work. Then 2012-2013 happened, which ended all of that. The loss in Memphis really solidified that the team was dead as constructed with Jefferson and Millsap as the lead. Then the rebuild started.