Amnesty Clause. Use it on Memo to get the space to sign Chandler.
Silencer, you need to silently do some salary-cap math.
Capwise, I don't know if the Jazz could've re-signed both Chandler and Kiri under the old (57% BRI), much less the new draconian deal. Feel free to spell out the numbers that show that it can be done.
Also, the notion that the Jazz would pay $8 million per year for an aging SF backup is quite ambitious.
Then again, they paid $10 million per year for an aging C backup.
What makes you think he has a better jumper? Wes is a 40% 3-pt shooter for his career. Chandler has shot 32% from 3 for his career.He's like a Wes Matthews, with a better jumper.
https://hoopshype.com/salaries/utah.htm
This has the Jazz committed to 55.6 mil next year with 9 players. Speculation on the new cap figure has been 58 to 64 mil. The luxury tax level would normally be around 70 mil. Kanter and Burks will be signed for about 5.5 mil. So that adds up to 61.1. There isn't enough cap space to make an offer to Chandler. It would have to be some kind of sign and trade. Memo or AK for Chandler is what would make sense.
What makes you think he has a better jumper? Wes is a 40% 3-pt shooter for his career. Chandler has shot 32% from 3 for his career.
I think it doesnt make sense to sign Chandler if we will resign Kirilenko but if he will be gone, then why not?
Chandler's jumper was terrible before last season. Last year he attempted less three-pointers per game than Wes and still shot only .350 vs. Wes's .407. Wes also averaged more points per game than Chandler last season. Wes is a much better shooter than Chandler. It's not even close.
I think it doesnt make sense to sign Chandler if we will resign Kirilenko but if he will be gone, then why not?
If we don't sign Chandler, and once Memo's contract expires we would have enough cap space to pursues players for the 2012 season. Which may be better players than Chandler.