What's new
By:

The Non-Jazz NBA Thread in the Jazz Section

Saint Cy of JFC said:
Ja Morant is going to have a case for MVP if this **** continues
Click to expand...
I actually watched that entire game and while he had some flashy moments he wasnt as good in that game as he was in few of the others, despite his good point total and decent shooting splits. Pretty sloppy with the ball at times.

Pels blew like a 15 point lead in the 4th and it was actually Smart, Bane and JJJ who were the main architects late in that game (Smart had a block and a steal on consecutive possessions, hit 2 FT and set up Bane for a wide open 3, after which Bane blocked McCollum on the other end).

Plus the refs who gave some very iffy fouls late when Grizz was in the bonus, inlcuding 1 with 0.4 seconds left and Grizz down by 1.
 
HermanG said:
I actually watched that entire game and while he had some flashy moments he wasnt as good in that game as he was in few of the others, despite his good point total and decent shooting splits. Pretty sloppy with the ball at times.

Pels blew like a 15 point lead in the 4th and it was actually Smart, Bane and JJJ who were the main architects late in that game (Smart had a block and a steal on consecutive possessions, hit 2 FT and set up Bane for a wide open 3, after which Bane blocked McCollum on the other end).

Plus the refs who gave some very iffy fouls late when Grizz was in the bonus, inlcuding 1 with 0.4 seconds left and Grizz down by 1.
Click to expand...
Despite all of what you posted being true, cy's point still stands.
If they keep winning then he should be in the convo. No Ja? Hella losses. Bottom 5 garbage team. With Ja? Top team in the league (if they keep winning). Pretty good argument for being valuable to his team imo.
 
fishonjazz said:
Despite all of what you posted being true, cy's point still stands.
If they keep winning then he should be in the convo. No Ja? Hella losses. Bottom 5 garbage team. With Ja? Top team in the league (if they keep winning). Pretty good argument for being valuable to his team imo.
Click to expand...

Isn't the rule about playing at least 65 games to qualify in effect?
 
fishonjazz said:
Despite all of what you posted being true, cy's point still stands.
If they keep winning then he should be in the convo. No Ja? Hella losses. Bottom 5 garbage team. With Ja? Top team in the league (if they keep winning). Pretty good argument for being valuable to his team imo.
Click to expand...
Ehhh I put those losses on Ja too since his dumbass behavior is what caused h to suspension.
 
Fosto said:
Isn't the rule about playing at least 65 games to qualify in effect?
Click to expand...
IDK but if so, then there is literally no chance for him to win lol.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Ehhh I put those losses on Ja too since his dumbass behavior is what caused h to suspension.
Click to expand...
You get the point though. It would show that his on court value is tremendous. Which is what the MVP award is based on.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Yeah Cavs not calling it quit any time soon. They might still be in play for a top 6 seed in the East when Garland/Mobley make their return.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top