What's new
By:

The Official Bolerjack Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 95
  • Start date Start date
NAOS said:
Your research is awesome, per usual.

I remember you hating on the populist tide that carried Trump to office. But when populism serves your interests, you're fine with it.

#milquetoast, folks.
Click to expand...

You missed the part of my post when I said I don't care one way or the other. I don't have an interest in this debate silly.
 
fishonjazz said:
You missed the part of my post when I said I don't care one way or the other. I don't have an interest in this debate silly.
Click to expand...

ok, thanks for chiming in, though! Nothing like getting involved in something you'll eventually milquetoast your way out of. Appreciate it.
 
NAOS said:
for my notes on your points (thanks, finally, btw):
*un-insightful, but easy listening
*occasionally enjoyable banter with is color guy
*voice (and enthusiasm)... kinda the same point

ok. pretty low bar. but ok.

Good job
Click to expand...

I know. Thankfully I like living with myself.
 
NAOS said:
That'd be a weird place.

I'll take your response as an indication that you would like this to remain on the interwebs.
Click to expand...

You have a way of saying things that you clearly may know what you mean, but I sure dont clearly know what you mean.
 
Archie Moses said:
He has great pipes.
1. He calls the plays well.
2. He gets me excited, as a viewer during intense moments.
3. Provides me with substantial information on players, teams and coaches. He may not go as deep as a guy like Locke, but I don't need that to enjoy a game.
4. His passion for the Jazz.
5. How respected he is in the broadcasting community. We're lucky to have him.

Ok, go ahead and tell me how superior your counter points are and how you'd figure I like him and now I'm intellectually inferior, a racist, a fascist, a white supremacist, xenophobic, etc.
Click to expand...

1. It is patently fair to disagree with this because of his low level of knowledge for the game.
2. That's cool. I'm glad you have that with him. For real.
3. It is patently fair to disagree with this because he doesn't actually share a lot of information on the opponent. Over the past 3 years I've listened almost entirely to enemy broadcasts, and MOST do better than him in this regard. Definitely above 70ish%
4. Ok. Vague.
5. The broadcasting community in Utah is lol, dude. I'm related to Bruce Lindsey and I can tell you that he's about as respected as it gets but has very little to say that isn't moral or banal. Loves to talk about family genealogy, doe. Dick Norse? lol.
 
NAOS said:
ok, thanks for chiming in, though! Nothing like getting involved in something you'll eventually milquetoast your way out of. Appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Had to. I'm #milquetoast man! It's what I do.
 
I like him. He gets pumped up at the appropriate moments and is comfortable to spend 82 games listening to. Could he be better with bringing the knowledge/more background? Absolutely. More stats, etc. during slow periods instead of blasé banter would be nice. The production team needs to feed him if it's not in him to do the research.
 
Things I like about Boler:

1. Voice
2. When he says "Houdini"
3. When he says "If you got the hammer use it"
4. When he says "buckle up"
5. When he uses "skip pass" incorrectly and I imagine how annoyed NAOS is at it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top