What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

I do not think the prosecution has proved their case enough to impeach. Not at this point.

Impeachment should be a high bar. That bar has not been met.

I think the House Dems should have allowed their subpoenas to go to the supreme court. They seem to have the attitude that they could pass impeachment so that was good enough. I feel like they should have demanded all the evidence and witnesses possible and let the Supreme Court have the final word on what would be allowed or not.

They failed to do that.

The Senate has little to work with. It's not enough to impeach. It just isn't.

This is over. Time for the 2020 election.

Any functioning adult is getting my vote.
 
Gameface said:
I do not think the prosecution has proved their case enough to impeach. Not at this point.

Impeachment should be a high bar. That bar has not been met.

I think the House Dems should have allowed their subpoenas to go to the supreme court. They seem to have the attitude that they could pass impeachment so that was good enough. I feel like they should have demanded all the evidence and witnesses possible and let the Supreme Court have the final word on what would be allowed or not.

They failed to do that.

The Senate has little to work with. It's not enough to impeach. It just isn't.

This is over. Time for the 2020 election.

Any functioning adult is getting my vote.
Click to expand...
Or, you know, the Senate could actually hold a trial and allow the House managers to call witnesses...

But anyway I completely disagree. Even without any additional witnesses the case against Trump is overwhelming.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Your comment is as biased as you accuse the Republicans of being. Why should Trump have to respond to the constant insinuations and claims of the Dems? The Russian fiasco basically burned up all of their credibility, yet the drama never ends. The phone call transcript was released within days of this issue becoming public. It didn't incriminate so Schiff simply made up an incriminating transcript and read it to the nation. Nice.
Click to expand...

Evidence against IMPOTUS exists.
Evidence against Biden us wholly imaginary.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Oh, so this is why charges from the Mueller report are part of the articles of impeachment?

Face it. The entire Russian fiasco was very, very different than the story the people who were pushing it claimed it was going to be.
Click to expand...

the Russian fiasco that definitively proved autocrat Putin interference in our election. That

Our dear leader continues to deny these facts. Believes Putin over American intelligence. Totally Unamerican. Totally unpatriotic.

the republicans have become the party of Putin.
 
Gameface said:
I do not think the prosecution has proved their case enough to impeach. Not at this point.

Impeachment should be a high bar. That bar has not been met.

I think the House Dems should have allowed their subpoenas to go to the supreme court. They seem to have the attitude that they could pass impeachment so that was good enough. I feel like they should have demanded all the evidence and witnesses possible and let the Supreme Court have the final word on what would be allowed or not.

They failed to do that.

The Senate has little to work with. It's not enough to impeach. It just isn't.

This is over. Time for the 2020 election.

Any functioning adult is getting my vote.
Click to expand...

How haven't they proved their case enough to impeach? Don't we all know, whether we be Republicans or Democrats, adults or children, politically active or politically disinterested what happened? Donald wanted to smear his political rival, so he attempted to strongarm Ukraine into publicly announcing an investigation of Biden. He relented when it became apparent that the whistleblower's report was going to expose this abuse of power.
Which is impeachable.
Donald has blocked any and every request from investigators into further exposing this fraud by refusing to turn over requested documents and allowing cabinet members from speaking.
Isn't this in and of itself impeachable?

What more needs to be proven?

IMO, the power of Bolton as a witness isn't to prove anything we don't already know. I have little doubt that he will expose anything new. The power of Bolton, a die hard Republican, in testifying against Trump is to compel even the strongest Republican partisans to admit that Trump needs to be removed. I could easily see Mulvaney, Rudy, and Pompeo turning on each other (and on Trump) in attempts to save their own necks after Bolton's testimony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top