What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

gandalfe said:
It's IRRELEVANT that it does not exonerate him?

You're an ideologue, a fanatic, pure and simple.
Click to expand...
It's irrelevant because he says that he couldn't find no crime. Duh dude. It's basic law that if you can't find no crime you are innocent. Do they not teach this in indoctrination classes anymore?
 
JazzyFresh said:
Thanks! The second part is absolutely irrelevant. Also the ghost crime would not be collusion, the ghost crime after contradicting himself would be obstruction(zero to do with collusion). By your own post he couldn't say whether or not that happened. By any SANE and lawful standards that's being innocent.

After...3...years... The best he got was there was no obstruction but I'm(Mueller) not going to say that even though I(Mueller) just said it the sentence before..
Click to expand...
You are truly a Trump acolyte. Keep the part that supports your case, throw out anything that doesn't, attack attack attack. Trump's battle-sheep.
 
JazzyFresh said:
It's irrelevant because he says that he couldn't find no crime. Duh dude. It's basic law that if you can't find no crime you are innocent. Do they not teach this in indoctrination classes anymore?
Click to expand...
This has to be a troll right? Right? No one is really this stupid are they?
 
C'mon dudes this should be easy

I did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
-Robert Mueller

"I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,”
-James Clapper

“I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community.”
-Samantha Power

“To the best of my recollection, there wasn’t anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause,”
-Susan Rice
 
JazzyFresh said:
What crime was committed?
Click to expand...
One night looking out your window you see someone open the door of your car and take something. You know it was your neighbor, you recognize him. You call the police. They take your statement then go talk to your neighbor. He says "no I didn't". They ask you for more evidence, like video or something. You don't have any. So they say "there is not sufficient evidence to say a crime was committed." Question: was a crime committed?
 
Not finding enough evidence does not equal innocent, which is why he worded it like he did.
 
All of this typing, all of this work, all of these facts, with actual witnesses, quotes from investigators to prove my point and the return intelligence I get is void. Not one of you have provided an intelligent response and resort to childish memes, whataboutisms, and just flat out stupidity like" my wife and a dog", a 30 second video years old, and some sort of stupid anogolgy about getting your house broken into. These are not answers, well they are cowardly answers.


This is why I left in the first place and am leaving again. I'm part of other boards where a simple yes or no is answered. Where people can use their words to explain their idealism. Where people can explain what law was broken. You guys are not smart plain an simple. I am embarrassed that I wasted my time but I admittedly forgot that the intelligence here is to not answer a simple question and resort to "look over there" tactics. A staple in the party.

Peace you worthless conversationalist. Be ready to lose again because the average American sees through your indoctrinating and ask the same questions I do.

Asking for evidence is not rocket science m
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top