The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[LogGrad98]

You're words. You hypocrites only trust it if it feeds your antiTrump addiction. That's it. Like any addict you need a fix so you pick and choose what you believe to get that drug rush.

The exact same can be said for you, in reverse. You've repeatedly ignored anything posted in this and other threads that is critical of trump that you can't shoe-horn into your narrow world-view. You refuse to respond, outright ignore, or provide the same tired excuses with no critical thought or evidence to back it up.

But I'm 99% sure you're just trolling. Because no one can be that obtuse for real.

 

[gandalfe]

Since you guys claim the Atlantic is journalism you MUST agree with this journalism or you a flat out hypocrite. Which a few of you are already but anyways.

“For this reason, strictly law-and-order Republicans who have responded in dismay to scenes of rioting and looting have an interest in Biden winning—even if they could never bring themselves to vote for him,” he writes.

He's openly admitting that if Trump wins Democrats will continue their violent, treasonous, inhumane and downright evil campaign and if Biden wins there will be peace because us Republicans are peaceful unlike you. Again some of you here are good people so I'm not pinning this on you but there's a few here @NAOS @Gameface @Zombie @silesian @Safetydan @LogGrad98 @The Thriller @Saint Cy of JFC that I know as a fact will continue their radical anti-American hatred campaign and continually be violent whether it be in words or actions like they do here.

Remember hypocrites 'journalism" so it's true no matter what. That's what you told me so let's not display the usual double standards.

Except, of course, that this is an opinion piece.

 

[LogGrad98]

The fact that you need a video to talk for you explains exactly everything I've said. You don't have an original thought in your programmed head. You are a grown
"Boi" for the love of Jesus have an original thought you robot.

Yes but can you answer the points brought up in the video?

And that is exactly what you do, post links then state the equivalent of "yer all stupid" with no critical analysis or additional thoughts that are actually your own.

 

[NAOS]

The fact that you need a video to talk for you explains exactly everything I've said. You don't have an original thought in your programmed head. You are a grown
"Boi" for the love of Jesus have an original thought you robot.

Can’t wait for more of your original reporting. You know, where you ‘provide witnesses’ all on your own. Yep, not using anybody else’s words as your own. Ever. **** boi.

 

[JazzyFresh]

The exact same can be said for you, in reverse. You've repeatedly ignored anything posted in this and other threads that is critical of trump that you can't shoe-horn into your narrow world-view. You refuse to respond, outright ignore, or provide the same tired excuses with no critical thought or evidence to back it up.

But I'm 99% sure you're just trolling. Because no one can be that obtuse for real.

You going to attack the article or me? You prove the point of the article. You guys can't have discourse and can't handle losing so you're going to terrorize innocent people. That's what the Article is stating and the way you guys act here it's obvious.

 

[LogGrad98]

You going to attack the article or me? You prove the point of the article. You guys can't have discourse and can't handle losing so you're going to terrorize innocent people. That's what the Article is stating and the way you guys act here it's obvious.

Again deflecting and compartmentalizing. Stay the course!

 

[JazzyFresh]

Can’t wait for more of your original reporting. You know, where you ‘provide witnesses’ all on your own. Yep, not using anybody else’s words as your own. Ever. **** boi.

See how hateful you guys are? This is what the article refers too. A bunch of grown ups who can't control their emotiona so they are going to riot if they lose. On the other hand Trump supporters will be hurt but outside of a few radicals we will live in piece.

You all are everything you accuse Trump of.

He's making peace deals in the Middle East you all are using anonymous sources, rioting, ambushing police, and calling for violence if you lose an election. Not one of you disputed the article do obviously you know it's true. So you attack me to stop the conversation. Attack attack attack. Violence violence violence. Historically it's in your blood

 

[JazzyFresh]

Again deflecting and compartmentalizing. Stay the course!

I posted the article first. You're the doing what you accuse me of. Usually if you're not an raging narcissist you answer a question before you ask one. Common sense.

 

[NAOS]

Can you explain what fascism is please? I

It looks like you provided an excellent one-word answer to your own question.

How much self-owning do you plan to achieve in your short stay here at JFC?

 

[LogGrad98]

I posted the article first. You're the doing what you accuse me of. Usually if you're not an raging narcissist you answer a question before you ask one. Common sense.

But you've ignored lots of questions then posted this one. Don't hold yourself to the same standards I see. Typical trumpist.

 

[Red]

Can you explain what fascism is please? I

Sure, it’s a long read, but you will be in a much better position to answer that question, and better able to understand the fascist strands in our own history:

American Fascism: It Has Happened Here | Sarah Churchwell

“When Americans think of dictators they always think of some foreign model,” wrote the anti-fascist journalist Dorothy Thompson in the mid-1930s, but an American dictator would be “one of the boys, and he will stand for everything traditionally American.” And the American people, Thompson added...

www.nybooks.com

Timothy Snyder is the leading American historian on the history of fascism in the 20th century. He recently pointed out, in a Washington Post commentary, how the basic Trump campaign strategy appears to be a good representation of fascist propoganda:

“A fascist guide to commentary on elections would have eight parts: contradict yourself to test the faith of your followers; tell a big lie to draw attention from basic realities; manufacture a crisis; designate enemies; make an appeal to pride and humiliation; express hostility to voting; cast doubt on democratic procedures; and aim for personal power.”

 

[NAOS]

See how hateful you guys are? This is what the article refers too. A bunch of grown ups who can't control their emotiona so they are going to riot if they lose. On the other hand Trump supporters will be hurt but outside of a few radicals we will live in piece.

You all are everything you accuse Trump of.

He's making peace deals in the Middle East you all are using anonymous sources, rioting, ambushing police, and calling for violence if you lose an election. Not one of you disputed the article do obviously you know it's true. So you attack me to stop the conversation. Attack attack attack. Violence violence violence. Historically it's in your blood

Keep pretending that you haven’t earned the hate you receive. It’s cute. Such a soft **** boi.