What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

JazzyFresh said:
Ok, I get that. But besides not knowing when, where, how, it happened, and having absolutely no witnesses there is little to no evidence it actually happened.

It's also came out that Ford's lawyer admits one of the reasons she went after Kavanaugh is his political stance.

There's plenty of room to question this. The left acting like it's 100% is flat out disgusting.
Click to expand...
I don't think we are actually acting like its 100%. My position, shared by most others on the left, is that women generally ought to be believed when they claim they were assaulted, and a their claims should be investigated.

I didn't find the "investigation" into Fords claims satisfactory as it was hamstrung by the White House and unnecessarily limited.


Again, there was a witness, you are asking for additional witnesses, which seems impossible considering the alleged assault occurred behind closed doors with only Ford and the perpetrators present.
 
The Thriller said:
I love how a handful of posters keep pretending that the whistleblower hasn’t provided any evidence and that everything he/she said is just rumor. They act as if this impeachment inquiry hasn’t already uncovered mountains of scandal that would’ve rocked any administration.

I mean already we know the accuracy and urgency of the whistleblower complaint. it was an ongoing effort made by many in this admin, including not just the president’s Personal lawyer but the sec of state and AG. We have learned that the president’s inner circle has tried to hide politically embarrassing phone calls to dictators on a secret server. HR McMaster claimed that communications with the Russians were “wholesome” and “appropriate” interesting descriptions now that we have learned that trump told Russian officials in those communications in 2017 that he didn’t mind their attacks on our election. So now it raises the possibility that HR McMaster, Mattis, Kelley, and Tillerson might’ve been witnesses to similar coverups.

Methinks these posters will have trouble maintaining their shield of denial and will move the goalposts in the upcoming weeks.
Click to expand...
$50 that Trump will not get impeached by this time next year.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Ok who are the first hand accounts and when and where did the allegations happen? I could be wrong but hearing something happened holds absolutely no weight in court. It may be evidence but it proves nothing.
Click to expand...
I feel like we're going in circles. All of the women who have come forward have given first hand accounts.
 
Zombie said:
I don't think we are actually acting like its 100%. My position, shared by most others on the left, is that women generally ought to be believed when they claim they were assaulted, and a their claims should be investigated.

I didn't find the "investigation" into Fords claims satisfactory as it was hamstrung by the White House and unnecessarily limited.


Again, there was a witness, you are asking for additional witnesses, which seems impossible considering the alleged assault occurred behind closed doors with only Ford and the perpetrators present.
Click to expand...

You don't remember the constant attacks and marches?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5416105/kavanaugh-protest/?amp=true
 
Zombie said:
First hand accounts are not rumors.
Click to expand...

Second hand accounts shouldn’t be dismissed. Erin Brokavich didn’t have to drink the poisoned water to expose the crime and corruption that was occurring. Besides, trumpers would just deny the first hand accounts. They’ll continuously move the goalposts in order to protect their tender precious and immature egos. They’ve been at the kool-aid trough for too long.

Many cultists after drinking the kool-aid will never wake up.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
How many times has the dam broke so far? There must be some sort of cosmic force that's holding that water back.
Click to expand...

I'm actually only aware of this time. If I felt that way prior, I might have said as much prior. Barr cleverly, slyly, dulled the impact the Mueller Report might have had, so it did not happen then. That's just how I feel about this week of cascading bad news for Trump.

I thought he had taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution. I thought, as the Commander-in-Chief, that it would be strange for the Commander to simply forgive Russia for attacking us. Very strange to tell the Russian ambassador to the US, and the Russian Foreign Minister that Russia's interference in our election did not concern him. Does he know Russia was our chief geopolitical adversary of the past 70 plus years? I should think our Commander-in-Chief would know that, and act appropriately. Does not look like that was the case.

Quite honestly, my opinion that is, I do not think Donald Trump is on our side. And that dam? That's the dam holding back all these revelations that are currently pouring forth. The dam has indeed broke. And I am not aware of this degree of cascading revelations, over such a short time, happening prior. Hence my comment.

And it pleases me, yes indeed, it pleases me. Not that my country should have to go through all this. But pleased that the truth will out. I believe that's what recent events portend, the truth will out. I'm all about that. Truth. It's very important to me. It's the kind of guy I am. My friends find it to be an admirable quality. And I admire those for whom truth is always the goal. We live but once. I prefer to live with honor. I cannot say my president is an honorable man. Pretty sad, really.

Things are coming into sharper focus. His encouragement of Russian interference in 2016 was not a one off. He's a lawless president.
 
Last edited:
JazzyFresh said:
Lol asking for proof is wrong? No wonder you dudes are so gullible. Proving something is frowned upon. Lol

I get it. You can't prove ****. So what do you do? Insult. I asked a SIMPLE question. I'm curious if women were actually drugged but I'm not going to call someone a rapist of rumors.
Click to expand...
Prove that Biden committed a crime! Hillary toooooooooo!!!!!!

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
The Thriller said:
Second hand accounts shouldn’t be dismissed. Erin Brokavich didn’t have to drink the poisoned water to expose the crime and corruption that was occurring. Besides, trumpers would just deny the first hand accounts. They’ll continuously move the goalposts in order to protect their tender precious and immature egos. They’ve been at the kool-aid trough for too long.

Many cultists after drinking the kool-aid will never wake up.
Click to expand...
Oh I completely agree. Linda Tripp gave a sendond hand account in the Lewinsky scandal that led to the blue dress. Somehow that was acceptable to the likes of Lindsey Graham and others back then.

I was merely pointing out that the claims JazzyFresh was talking about were not rumors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top