In that case, the second-hand information led to the discovery of real forensic evidence. That's helpful. Second-hand information that doesn't have evidence is just an allegation, at best.
The official "let's impeach Trump" thread
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
In that case, the second-hand information led to the discovery of real forensic evidence. That's helpful. Second-hand information that doesn't have evidence is just an allegation, at best.
JazzyFresh
Banned
I only posted that because you said you weren't sure the left thought he was guilty yet you just said otherwise...
So like a whistleblower report that turned up a document related to a phone call where the President asks a foreign leader to investigate a political rival? That kind of evidence?
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
I didn't post a video from MSNBC CBS CNN NBC ABC BVD MMMHHMM
JazzyFresh
Banned
It's hilarious that the guy who just damned Trump over a tweet has the audacity to call people cultist. What an absolute hypocrite.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
So I'm sure we'll stop hearing that we shouldn't investigate the claims made by the whistleblower because there's no way that could happen again.
By all means, the whistleblower's allegations should be investigated, as should the whistleblower. When real evidence arrives, I'm sure we'll all hear about it.
In related news, it appears that the House is now going on vacation for the next two weeks. I applaud their conviction and steely resolve in the face of this self-proclaimed constitutional crisis.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
Good to know you support an impeachment inquiry then.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Wasn’t the whistleblower in a way already investigated when he/she reported the complaint and his/her complaint was deemed “credible” and “urgent?”
Why should be be extensively investigated if the complaint he made was accurate and has revealed a devastating amount of corruption? What is to be gained by investigating him/her personally? Shouldn’t rule of law supersede politics or personal vendettas?
Why are trumpers holding this whistleblower to a standard they’ve never applied to any previous one?
Isn’t the impeachment inquiry supposed to continue to investigate his/her complaint? Thus far it’s been very fruitful and damaging to Donald.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
Not to worry the impeachment inquiry will be continuing through the recess. Interviews hearing subpoenas and all.
Just for reference, the process of impeachment would normally begin with a clear charge of a High Crime or Misdemeanor, some evidence to support that accusation, and a House vote to approve the impeachment inquiry. Pelosi is skipping the House vote and is light on evidence far. It's her call though.