What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Gameface said:
He has followed orders. He has no personal interest.

When he testified he was told he could only discuss things that were directly in the report. That's why he kept asking "what page is that on?" the whole time.

He was a Marine and he follows orders.
Click to expand...
Lol now that's a bit crazy bro.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Just going to post this since Pelosi is demanding others to follow her Communist threats and not be afforded the same 1st Amendment rights that were afforded to her tyrannical impeachment that she failed at.



Sick woman leading a sick party. Luckily for true Americans we know exactly how much hate is in her and seen right though it.
Click to expand...


And I'm just going to post this, because the tweet is a lie, and I'd hate to see anyone take this bs seriously. Pelosi tore up Trump's speech at the conclusion of his speech. This clip, on the other hand, was cobbled together to make it appear she was tearing up his speech at moments when the Tuskegee Airman was honored, the reunion of loved ones, etc. In other words, the tweet is another way Trump delivers untruths. Its another example of how Trump creates alternative realities. It may be obvious enough, but if you're not aware that the tweet was created in order to render a false impression, Now you do....

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/video-trumps-misleading-post-on-pelosi-ripping-up-sotu-address/
 
Last edited:
I know you ****ing sicko POS Trump supporters tried to paint Muller as some sort of partisan anti-Trump attack dog, but he never was. Muller dedicated his entire life to the service of the United States. He was assigned a job and he did his job. He had no personal interest in the outcome. He just did his job.
 
Red said:
And I'm just going to post this, because the tweet is a lie, and I'd hate to see anyone take this bs seriously. Pelosi tore up Trump's speech at the conclusion of his speech. This clip, on the other hand, was cobbled together to make it appear she was tearing up his speech at moments when the Tuskegee Airman was honored, the reunion of loved ones, etc. In other words, the tweet is another way Trump delivers untruths. Its another example of how Trump creates alternative realities. It may be obvious enough, but if you're not aware that the tweet was created in order to render a false impression, Now you do....
Click to expand...
No when she tore that speech up, that what she was tearing up. She was tearing up the gratitude he gave those folks. You may have enjoyed it but what she did was wrong.

If you can't understand what the message behind that tweet was you are plainly ignorant.
 
Gameface said:
I know you ****ing sicko POS Trump supporters tried to paint Muller as some sort of partisan anti-Trump attack dog, but he never was. Muller dedicated his entire life to the service of the United States. He was assigned a job and he did his job. He had no personal interest in the outcome. He just did his job.
Click to expand...
And he found Trump did nothing worth an indictment. Why don't you agree with him rather than **** on him?
 
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-...says-its-up-to-congress-to-indict-a-president

“The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation,” Mueller said. “We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the Acting Attorney General apprised of the progress of our work. As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.” (What it does say is “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Click to expand...

After stating that he and his colleagues couldn’t clear Trump, Mueller reiterated that they also didn’t make any determination “as to whether the President did commit a crime.” Then he explained the reasoning behind this omission. Under a long-standing Department of Justice policy, “a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” he said. “That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that, too, is prohibited. The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and, by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”
Click to expand...

learn to ****ing read @JazzyFresh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top