What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

JazzyFresh said:
Answer the question. For once you guys answer simple *** questions instead of move the goal post.

Who is the witness?
What evidence is there?
Conjecture is not evidence.
Posting links doesn't answer anything
Click to expand...
I'm a witness, and now you can be a witness, too.
 
"I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified in 2017. “That’s not to say that there weren’t concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, according to the transcript of her interview, was asked about the same issue. Power replied: “I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community.”
 
Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice was asked the same question.

“To the best of my recollection, there wasn’t anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause,” she said, according to her transcribed interview, in response to whether she had any evidence of conspiracy. “I don’t recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw…conspiracy prior to my departure.”
 
JazzyFresh said:
Just a taste.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com
Click to expand...
So this said the FISA process, and the application for surveillance by the FBI for an individual possibly connected to Russia-gate, was riddled with errors and even a few outright changes of possible evidence. Where does it state that the media admitted to fabricating the whole thing, or that anyone admitted to that?

Also there was this:

The report debunked claims by the president that the Russia investigation was motivated by political bias. But it revealed a dysfunctional system in which a team of investigators, handpicked to conduct one of the FBI's most sensitive investigations, committed "basic and fundamental errors."
Click to expand...

So do you have a link where anyone at all admitted to fabricating the whole thing?
 
Now that's evidence. That's actual people, Obama people, admitting they had absolutely no evidence Trump colluded.

Now you sheep provide me with the same respect I gave you. Remember there is also video evidence of your sheep media saying there was direct evidence that Trump colluded
 
LogGrad98 said:
So this said the FISA process, and the application for surveillance by the FBI for an individual possibly connected to Russia-gate, was riddled with errors and even a few outright changes of possible evidence. Where does it state that the media admitted to fabricating the whole thing, or that anyone admitted to that?

Also there was this:



So do you have a link where anyone at all admitted to fabricating the whole thing?
Click to expand...
Yes... Where is the indictment after 3 years and 30+ billion spent?

I mean, duh dude.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Yes... Where is the indictment after 3 years and 30+ billion spent?

I mean, duh dude.
Click to expand...
So an investigation didn't yield enough evidence to convict so that automatically means it was purposely fabricated? I think there are a few more straws you could grasp at.
 
LogGrad98 said:
So this said the FISA process, and the application for surveillance by the FBI for an individual possibly connected to Russia-gate, was riddled with errors and even a few outright changes of possible evidence. Where does it state that the media admitted to fabricating the whole thing, or that anyone admitted to that?

Also there was this:



So do you have a link where anyone at all admitted to fabricating the whole thing?
Click to expand...
"I did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
-Robert Mueller
 
LogGrad98 said:
So an investigation didn't yield enough evidence to convict so that automatically means it was purposely fabricated? I think there are a few more straws you could grasp at.
Click to expand...
I provided Obama officials that said they had absolutely no evidence that it happened. And I provided a direct quote from the guy investigating. Here let's show you again.
"I did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
 
JazzyFresh said:
"I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified in 2017. “That’s not to say that there weren’t concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, according to the transcript of her interview, was asked about the same issue. Power replied: “I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community.”
Click to expand...
Dudes in his campaign were straight up convicted though lololololololol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top