What's new

The Official "Let's Vote Trump Out" Thread!

I didn't say you, personally. But your solution is not an overnight practical solution because the resources are not there. It will be a slow process. In the meantime, what do you want to do with people who are not in a position to take care of themselves? Where do you want to put them?
It was an insinuation. It wasn't meant to be taken out of context either way(mine or yours) I know.

To answer your question, more than just shoving them out on the street, opening clinics where it's ok to shoot up, and leaving them out on a cirb. That's what is happening now and that is the worst thing one can do imo. We won't agree but I 100% feel doing so enables people to not seek help and only pushes them further into the huge seas of darkness.

That's been my problem since we started this conversation. The wrongness of what these cities are doing nothing more.

Now answer my question every single one of you has dodged please. If doing what theses cities are doing is working, why are the homeless numbers sky rocketing? What is the current solution solving?
 
Not really at all by reading that. I've already said it has some good uses but it is also has some terrible uses. I admitted earlier I was an addict and work first hand in retail and the misconceptions these articles use I see first hand daily. Hell one of my ex roommates back in the day would fill the fridge full of luxury foods biweekly. Another friend milked it for years. They even talked me into it and I felt too guilty so I got off after a month.
 
"your solution, Jazzy? To not help people in the hopes that they all die and then the problem is solved?"


Yeah she did. Your inability to read a damn sentence is astonishing. Please stay out of the conversation if your going to be a liar.

If I were unable to tell the difference between a statement and a rhetorical question, would you think my inability to read was more astonishing or less astonishing than you claimed?

Behavior like this is why people think you are sensitive. I mean, you *could* have asked yourself why I read here a completely different way than you did. Instead, you went on the attack. Why do you think that is?
 
It was an insinuation. It wasn't meant to be taken out of context either way(mine or yours) I know.

To answer your question, more than just shoving them out on the street, opening clinics where it's ok to shoot up, and leaving them out on a cirb. That's what is happening now and that is the worst thing one can do imo. We won't agree but I 100% feel doing so enables people to not seek help and only pushes them further into the huge seas of darkness.

That's been my problem since we started this conversation. The wrongness of what these cities are doing nothing more.

Now answer my question every single one of you has dodged please. If doing what theses cities are doing is working, why are the homeless numbers sky rocketing? What is the current solution solving?
You uh, like... didn't even attempt to answer the question. So it's not your turn to ask questions yet. It's still your turn to answer.
 
If I were unable to tell the difference between a statement and a rhetorical question, would you think my inability to read was more astonishing or less astonishing than you claimed?

Behavior like this is why people think you are sensitive. I mean, you *could* have asked yourself why I read here a completely different way than you did. Instead, you went on the attack. Why do you think that is?
My answer was rhetorically the same moron. Pot meet kettle.
 
Now answer my question every single one of you has dodged please. If doing what theses cities are doing is working, why are the homeless numbers sky rocketing? What is the current solution solving?

Problems contributing to homelessness, to different degrees in different areas:
1) Fewer well-paying jobs for those with a high-school education (or less)
2) Lack of affordable housing
3) Inadequate mental health facilities
4) Migration due to weather and other circumstances
5) Incarceration rates

I agree the current solutions don't work. We need to do better, which is different from doing less.
 
It was an insinuation. It wasn't meant to be taken out of context either way(mine or yours) I know.

To answer your question, more than just shoving them out on the street, opening clinics where it's ok to shoot up, and leaving them out on a cirb. That's what is happening now and that is the worst thing one can do imo. We won't agree but I 100% feel doing so enables people to not seek help and only pushes them further into the huge seas of darkness.

That's been my problem since we started this conversation. The wrongness of what these cities are doing nothing more.

Now answer my question every single one of you has dodged please. If doing what theses cities are doing is working, why are the homeless numbers sky rocketing? What is the current solution solving?
Your actual answer was that you'd do "more" than what's being done now.

That's literally what you said right after you wrote "To answer your question..."

More what?

ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!
 
My answer was rhetorically the same moron. Pot meet kettle.

My point, which you may or may not have missed, was that "To not help people in the hopes that they all die and then the problem is solved?" was a rhetorical question, and not aimed at you in any way.
 
Adding nothing but drunken diatribe. Be my guest.
I don't need your invitation.

But for the record, I work nights. I woke up today at 4pm, it's my day off. I haven't had any alcoholic beverages. I just finished my coffee.

So, try again.
 
Back
Top