What's new
By:

The Paths Forward From Here

Which path should we take?

  • Compete now - Trade for a "star" (Dejounte Murray, Zach LaVine, Quickley, or a similar type player)

    Votes: 16 21.1%

  • Chill mode - Just ride the fence until next offseason

    Votes: 2 2.6%

  • Consolidate and roll with the young players more - trade some of KO, THT, Clarkson, Collins, Sexton

    Votes: 50 65.8%

  • Tank City - Pursue a Lauri trade that nets us a haul and start a true 3-4 year tank

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Total voters
    76
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Scrap heap is probably overstating it, but he's a pretty average big. Whatever Thibs is doing with him hasnt come close to that year he had for teh Clippers.
Click to expand...
He's a finesse big (the good kind, unlike Kessler) but I guess the Knicks don't really need that side of his game. He's getting a lot less early paint touches than with the Clips.

IMO NY would do fine with a guy like Yurt7.
 
Tremendous Upside said:
He's a finesse big (the good kind, unlike Kessler) but I guess the Knicks don't really need that side of his game. He's getting a lot less early paint touches than with the Clips.

IMO NY would do fine with a guy like Yurt7.
Click to expand...
With Robinson being as injury prone as he is I think paying Hartenstein 8-10M is an okay use of cap. Its paying for Donte, Hart, RJ and then pay raises for Grimes, Brunson, IQ that will make things difficult for them.
 
If Quickly is so amazing that the Jazz should be trading multiple picks for him and signing him to a big contract, why is he only getting 24 mpg and why would the Knicks entertain trading him?

I don't follow the Knicks so this is a real question. Is it just because they already have Brunson and wouldn't want to have so much money going to guards?
 
Friend2bees said:
If Quickly is so amazing that the Jazz should be trading multiple picks for him and signing him to a big contract, why is he only getting 24 mpg and why would the Knicks entertain trading him?

I don't follow the Knicks so this is a real question. Is it just because they already have Brunson and wouldn't want to have so much money going to guards?
Click to expand...
Their best at is 6' tall and IQ is 6'2. It's not that hard to understand
 
tksavis said:
It’s a different economic era in terms of salary cap and player salary ranges. What IQ is apparently looking for won’t seem that crazy very soon
Click to expand...

I still wouldn't be the team that gives it to him....assuming anyone does. FWIW, IQ may think he deserves Desmond Bane money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top